【24h】

THE COMING CHANGE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PARADIGM

机译:环保范式的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Human beings have long regarded nature as a hostile power, as both an unpredictable and alien force. Securing food and shelter was an arduous and indeed often dangerous task. More recently, with the growth in human population and the emergence of powerful technologies, we have started to regard nature as a material resource to be exploited for substantial gains. Exploiting nature was the main goal of military conquest and of industrial and commercial development. With the overexploitation of certain resources, a new way of viewing nature has arisen, based largely on nonutilitarian premises. This view emphasizes the importance of wilderness for aesthetic appreciation and sees nature as an antidote to human activities, as a model of harmony. Alongside these philosophical or cultural motivations, the scientific approach to nature has also been developing a view that divides nature into inventories of objects for classification and description. The scientific foundation of environmental management is a recent development, and attempts at environmental protection were based on separating selected areas from human interference. This notion of environmental protection motivated the initial creation of reserves and national parks. Such conceptions have been key to conservation in the twentieth century, with nonutilitarian motives to a great extent shaping the general approach. Because agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, industry, urbanisation and trade exploited nature and visibly disturbed and impoverished biodiversity, their expansion was considered hostile to conservation. Prior to an understanding of such basic ecosystem processes as energy flows, material cycles and their ecosystem control mechanisms, as well as of the transfer of information (e.g. the mechanisms of evolution), there was no ground for reconciliation of human economic activity with environmental protection. Environmentalists claimed that economic activity, for instance, farming, and environmental protection are inherently contradictory. Therefore economic activity and environmental zones should be territorially separated, implying that wilderness can be protecteded only in areas shielded from human economic activities. Such convictions shaped the paradigm of environmental protection for the first three quaters of the twentieth century. At the beginning of the ninth decade of this century, it was recognized that there was a need to change this environmental paradigm (IUCN 1980, Clark and Munn 1986, Brundtland 1987). The reasons for this change will be discussed below, together with some of the implications that this change has on the formulation of a new paradigm. But first a short analysis of modern trends in ecology will be presented.
机译:人类长期以来一直将自然视作一种敌对力量,既是不可预测的力量,也是外来力量。确保食物和住所是一项艰巨的任务,而且确实经常是危险的任务。最近,随着人口的增长和强大技术的出现,我们已经开始将自然视为一种可以获取实质收益的物质资源。开发自然是军事征服以及工商业发展的主要目标。随着某些资源的过度开发,出现了一种主要基于非功利性前提的观察自然的新方法。这种观点强调了荒野对审美的重要性,并将自然视为人类活动的解毒剂,是和谐的典范。除了这些哲学或文化动机外,对自然的科学方法也一直在发展一种将自然分为物体分类和描述的清单的观点。环境管理的科学基础是最近的发展,环境保护的尝试是基于将选定区域与人为干扰区分开来的。这种环境保护的观念促使人们初步建立了保护区和国家公园。这种观念在20世纪一直是保护的关键,非功利动机在很大程度上塑造了一般方法。由于农业,林业,渔业,采矿业,工业,城市化和贸易都利用了自然资源,并明显地扰乱了生物多样性并使其陷入贫困,因此,将其扩张视为对保护不利。在了解诸如能量流,物质循环及其生态系统控制机制之类的基本生态系统过程以及信息传递(例如,进化机制)之前,还没有将人类经济活动与环境保护相协调的基础。 。环保主义者声称,经济活动,例如农业和环境保护本质上是矛盾的。因此,经济活动和环境区域应在地域上分开,这意味着只能在与人类经济活动隔绝的地区保护荒野。这些信念塑造了二十世纪前四分之三的环境保护范式。在本世纪九十年代初,人们认识到有必要改变这种环境范式(IUCN 1980,Clark and Munn 1986,Brundtland 1987)。更改的原因将在下面讨论,以及此更改对新范式制定的一些影响。但是首先将对现代生态趋势进行简短分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号