首页> 外文会议>NATO advanced research workshop on energy and environmental challenges to security; 20071121-23; Budapest(HU) >ENERGY SECURITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN EASTERN EUROPE: THE CASE STUDY OF UKRAINE
【24h】

ENERGY SECURITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN EASTERN EUROPE: THE CASE STUDY OF UKRAINE

机译:东欧的能源安全与环境:以乌克兰为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine, energy security has become a top priority because of their acute vulnerabilities. These states consume far more energy relative to the size of their economies than Western European countries because of the relatively large size of the industrial sector in their economies and energy inefficiencies in all sectors. Large quantities of natural gas and oil are imported from or through the Russian Federation to fuel this demand and to compensate for insufficient domestic energy supplies. These countries lack a diversity of energy suppliers and have been subject to gas supply interruptions and sharp price increases, allegedly to advance Russia's economic and political interests. In response to these risks, Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine are attempting to enhance their energy security with a variety of policies and programs. It is critical for these countries to devise energy policies from a comprehensive perspective, including the likely environmental impacts of any proposed energy policy. With a broad policy perspective, governments can determine the best way to achieve their energy security goals without undermining other policy objectives. It is especially important that governments be cognizant that the negative environmental impacts of their energy policies may themselves create security challenges. Ukraine has recently responded to its energy insecurities with new policies, most notably its "Energy Strategy Until 2030". Drafted and adopted in 2006 in the wake of gas supply interruptions and steep price hikes, the Strategy focuses on how Ukraine can meet a growing energy demand while reducing gas imports. The Strategy calls for a dramatic expansion of nuclear and coal power, but neglects to answer how these strategies are better than the alternatives. The environmental and social consequences of the Strategy have yet to be adequately analysed and the Strategy raises difficult questions for both Ukraine and its neighbours.
机译:对于白俄罗斯,摩尔多瓦和乌克兰,由于其严重的脆弱性,能源安全已成为头等大事。这些国家相对于其经济规模消耗的能源要比西欧国家多得多,这是因为其经济中工业部门的规模相对较大以及所有部门的能源效率低下。从俄罗斯联邦或通过俄罗斯联邦进口了大量的天然气和石油,以补充这一需求并弥补国内能源供应不足。这些国家缺乏多元化的能源供应商,受到天然气供应中断和价格急剧上涨的影响,据称是为了促进俄罗斯的经济和政治利益。为应对这些风险,白俄罗斯,摩尔多瓦和乌克兰正在尝试通过各种政策和计划来增强其能源安全。对于这些国家而言,至关重要的是要从综合角度制定能源政策,包括任何拟议能源政策可能对环境造成的影响。从广泛的政策角度来看,政府可以确定实现其能源安全目标的最佳方法,而不会损害其他政策目标。各国政府意识到其能源政策对环境的负面影响本身可能带来安全挑战,这一点尤其重要。乌克兰最近通过新政策应对能源不安全问题,其中最著名的是“直到2030年的能源战略”。该战略于2006年在天然气供应中断和价格急剧上涨之后起草并通过,重点关注乌克兰如何在减少天然气进口的同时满足不断增长的能源需求。该战略要求大力发展核电和煤炭发电,但忽视了这些战略比其他替代方案更好的答案。该战略对环境和社会的影响尚未得到充分分析,该战略对乌克兰及其邻国都提出了难题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号