首页> 外文会议>National Conference on Environmental Science and Technology; 20020908-10; Greensboro,NC(US) >Reliability of Contaminant Transport Modeling on Vadose Zone Sampling Methods in Structured Soils
【24h】

Reliability of Contaminant Transport Modeling on Vadose Zone Sampling Methods in Structured Soils

机译:结构性土壤渗流区采样方法污染物迁移模型的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Development and validation of predictive models is highly dependent on the type (sampling method) and robustness (spatial and temporal frequency) of available data. Thus, emphasis was placed on contaminant sampling methods and the use of models to accurately predict contaminant fate in field soils. Suction cup lysime-ters, vapor samplers and soil cores, were used to extract water samples from the vadose zone of structured soils. Tritium composition of soil core samples was determined at random intervals near the sampling clusters. A mass balance of the applied tritium and precipitation was performed. Soil profile tritium analysis and breakthrough curves were used to indicate the predominant flowpaths sampled by each technique. The fractions of the tritium sampled by each sampling method were predicted with: 1) a simple local mass balance of water and solutes transport model (Burns method), 2) the steady-state con-vective-dispersive model (HYDRUS 1-D), and 3) the field-based Cornell preferential flow model. Comparison of results from these three models with actual data from two field plots demonstrate how different field sampling methods can affect modeling results.
机译:预测模型的开发和验证高度依赖于可用数据的类型(采样方法)和健壮性(时空频率)。因此,重点放在污染物采样方法和模型的使用上,以准确预测田间土壤中的污染物命运。吸盘溶菌器,蒸气取样器和土壤芯被用来从结构化土壤的渗流带中提取水样。在样品簇附近随机间隔确定土壤核心样品的组成。进行了balance和沉淀的质量平衡。使用土壤剖面tri分析和穿透曲线来表明每种技术采样的主要流动路径。每种采样方法所采样的the的分数可通过以下方法预测:1)水和溶质的简单局部质量平衡运移模型(Burns方法),2)稳态对流扩散模型(HYDRUS 1-D) ,以及3)基于现场的康奈尔优先流模型。这三个模型的结果与两个现场图的实际数据的比较表明,不同的现场采样方法如何影响建模结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号