首页> 外文会议>ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition >PERFORMANCE AND EMISSION ASSESSMENT ON A 3KW MICRO GAS TURBINE: COMPARISON OF RANS AND LES PREDICTIONS
【24h】

PERFORMANCE AND EMISSION ASSESSMENT ON A 3KW MICRO GAS TURBINE: COMPARISON OF RANS AND LES PREDICTIONS

机译:3KW微型燃气轮机的性能和排放评估:RAN和LES预测的比较

获取原文

摘要

Computational fluid dynamics represent a powerful tool to assess the performance of a combustor and identify possible issues/instabilities, helping thus e.g. to investigate the impact of advanced cycle modifications on the combustion in mGTs. The steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach is still mostly used in this framework. With growing computational power, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) has gained more interest. LES provides higher details concerning flow structures and can better predict possible instabilities, specifically needed for advanced cycle modelling. On the other hand, LES remain rather challenging for real industrial applications. This work aims at providing an answer whether the advantages of LES justify the much higher computational costs. The objective of the present study is thus to assess the combustion performance and emissions of a typical small-scale 3.2 kW_e micro gas turbine (mGT), using steady RANS and LES for various fuels. In this framework, a comparison of RANS and LES approaches (two levels of fidelity) is performed on a typical industrial case, to point out the strengths and weakness of each method with regard to industrial and research needs. The results show that both RANS (at a reduced cost) and LES can accurately predict the time-averaged trends of the main performance parameters, like temperature levels and emissions, also using various non-conventional inlet conditions. For the accurate prediction of the instabilities, the LES approach stands out as this approach takes into account the time-variation of the different quantities. Finally, a significant discrepancy has been observed between the CO levels provided by RANS and LES approaches where LES is overestimating the level of CO in the exhaust gases. Whereas it is difficult for LES to compete with convincing results provided by RANS, especially in the prediction of global emissions at reduced simulation cost, the LES strengths come out especially in flame and combustion stability analysis.
机译:计算流体动力学代表一个强大的工具,用于评估燃烧器的性能并识别可能的问题/不稳定性,从而帮助。探讨先进的循环修饰对MGTS燃烧的影响。稳定的雷诺瓦斯平均的Navier-Stokes(Rans)方法仍然主要用于本框架。随着计算能力不断增长,大涡模拟(LES)获得了更多的兴趣。 LES提供更高的流动结构细节,可以更好地预测可能的不稳定性,专门用于高级循环建模。另一方面,LES仍然挑战真正的工业应用。这项工作旨在提供答案是否证明了更高的计算成本。因此,本研究的目的是评估典型的小型3.2kW_E微燃气涡轮机(MGT)的燃烧性能和排放,使用各种燃料的稳定RAN和LES。在该框架中,对典型工业案例进行RAN和LES方法的比较(两个级别),以指出每个方法关于工业和研究需求的方法的强度和弱点。结果表明,两个RAN(以降低的成本)和LES可以准确地预测主要性能参数的时间平均趋势,如温度水平和排放,也使用各种非传统入口条件。为了精确预测不稳定性,LES方法突出,因为这种方法考虑了不同数量的时变。最后,在RAN和LES方法提供的CO水平之间观察到了显着的差异,其中LES高估了废气中的CO水平。虽然LES很难与RAN提供的令人信服的结果竞争,但特别是在降低模拟成本的全球排放的预测中,LES强度尤其在火焰和燃烧稳定性分析中出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号