首页> 外文会议>ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition >REYNOLDS STRESS FIELD AND TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY BUDGET IN A REPEATING COMPRESSOR STAGE
【24h】

REYNOLDS STRESS FIELD AND TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY BUDGET IN A REPEATING COMPRESSOR STAGE

机译:重复压缩机阶段中的雷诺应力场和湍流动力量预算

获取原文

摘要

Turbulence modelling in compressor passages continues to be a challenging problem. In order to better understand the shortcomings of turbulence modelling, a LES and a RANS computation were performed of a repeating compressor stage. The computation was carried out near the aerodynamic design point of the compressor stage, in order to minimise the challenge posed to the turbulence model. The use of a repeating stage configuration removes the need to specify the statistics of the incoming turbulent field; the statistics become an output of the simulation and not an input. This is a critical fact that greatly increases the credibility of the current LES compressor simulation over many previous simulations. As the computations are performed at mid-span, radial gradients can safely be assumed to be small, thus removing issues associated with capturing flow features attributed to 3D geometry. The flow field is assumed to be incompressible, which is required in order to achieve a true repeating stage environment. The RANS computation is based on a state-of-the-art turbulence model. At the same flow coefficient, the RANS simulation yielded a total pressure rise very near that of the LES simulation. However, there are nontrivial differences in the flow details. The mean flow and Reynolds shear stress boundary layer profiles are in good agreement in regions of favourable pressure gradient, but significant differences exist in the presence of adverse pressure-gradients. The turbulent kinetic energy profiles however are in poor agreement throughout the flow. The mean flow production rates predicted by the RANS computation are largely similar to those of the LES simulation forward of mid-chord where the pressure gradient is favourable. A notable exception is the leading-edge region where the LES predicts negative production i.e. a net transfer of energy to the time-mean flow, and the region aft of mid-chord where the pressure gradient is adverse. Outside of the viscous sub-layer, the dissipation rates are also predicted correctly by the RANS simulation forward of mid-chord where the pressure gradient is favourable. Aft of mid-chord however, there are significant differences in the dissipation rates.
机译:压缩机通道中的湍流建模仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。为了更好地理解湍流建模的缺点,对重复压缩机阶段进行LES和RAN计算。计算在压缩机级的空气动力学设计点附近进行,以最小化湍流模型所带来的挑战。重复阶段配置的使用消除了指定输入湍流场的统计数据的需要;统计数据成为模拟的输出而不是输入。这是一个关键的事实,大大提高了当前LES压缩机模拟的信誉在许多之前的模拟中。当计算在中跨时执行时,可以安全地假设径向梯度较小,从而消除与捕获到3D几何形状的捕获流特征相关联的问题。假设流场是不可压缩的,这是必需的,以实现真正的重复阶段环境。的RANS计算是基于状态的最先进的湍流模型。在相同的流量系数下,RAN模拟产生的总压力升高非常接近LES仿真。然而,流动细节存在非差异。平均流动和雷诺剪切应力边界层轮廓在良好的压力梯度区域方面处于良好的一致性,但在不利的压力梯度存在下存在显着的差异。然而,湍流动能曲线在整个流动过程中处于差。 RAN计算预测的平均流量产生率在很大程度上类似于中间和弦梯度是有利的中间和弦的LES模拟。值得注意的例外是线边缘区域,其中LES预测负产生即,能量的净转移到时间平均流动,以及压力梯度不利的中间和弦的区域AFT。在粘性子层之外,耗散速率也通过Rans模拟中间和弦仿真正确地预测,其中压力梯度有利。然而,中弦的后,耗散率存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号