首页> 外文会议>ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering >SUBSEA PIPELINES AND FLOWLINES DECOMMISSIONING - WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW FOR A RATIONAL APPROACH
【24h】

SUBSEA PIPELINES AND FLOWLINES DECOMMISSIONING - WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW FOR A RATIONAL APPROACH

机译:海底管道和流动线路退役 - 我们应该知道什么是合理的方法

获取原文

摘要

Offshore and subsea decommissioning will increase in the next five years or so as many producing fields are matured and cease production while the oil price continues to remain low. This emphasizes the need for a thorough decommissioning plan to ensure a safe and technically feasible solution while it is economically viable and safeguards the environment. Offshore and subsea decommissioning is commonly considered on a case-by-case basis using the Comparative Assessment (CA) process in which the best decommissioning solution is obtained. Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) considerations are always paramount in any decommissioning process. The aim is to significantly reduce the long term risks to other benefactors of the sea while the associated short term risks to those responsible for decommissioning operations are minimized. A major part of any decommissioning project is subsea pipelines decommissioning (by "pipelines", it is meant to include flowlines, trunklines and flexible too). There are a number of techniques available for decommissioning of subsea pipelines ranging from preservation for potential future use to full recovery or leaving in-situ. However, each subsea pipeline decommissioning technique should be considered on its own merit. Selection of each decommissioning technique depends on many parameters, inter alia, size of pipeline, type of pipeline (e.g. single pipe, pipe-in-pipe, piggyback), type of conveying fluid, operational environment (location), production history, Inspection, Repair and Maintenance (IRM) records, HSE considerations, connection to other facilities, technical feasibility (including potential use of advanced technologies), regulatory authorities requirements and socio-economic considerations. This paper will look at specifics of subsea pipelines decommissioning. It will examine the procedures to be undertaken from desk top activities (e.g. planning and CA) up to operational activities (e.g. pigging, flushing, cleaning, removal or leaving in-situ). Different scenarios are discussed and potential advantages and disadvantages of each scenario are presented. In addition, a guide is proposed for future pipelines decommissioning projects to follow a rational approach.
机译:离岸和海底退役将在未来五年内增加,或者由于许多生产领域已经成熟并停止生产,而油价继续保持低。这强调需要彻底的退役计划,以确保安全和技术上可行的解决方案,同时在经济上可行和保护环境。使用比较评估(CA)过程通常考虑海上和海底退役,以便获得最佳退役解决方案。在任何退役过程中,健康,安全和环境(HSE)考虑始终至关重要。目的是大大减少海洋其他福管的长期风险,而对负责退役行动的人的相关短期风险最小化。任何退役项目的主要部分都是海底管道退役(通过“管道”,它意味着包括流动线,Trunklines和灵活性)。有许多技术可用于退役海底管道,从保存范围内,潜在的未来用来全面恢复或离开原地。但是,应根据自己的优点考虑每个海底管道退役技术。每个退役技术的选择取决于许多参数,特别是管道的大小,管道的类型(例如,单管,管中管,捎带),式输送流体,操作环境(位置)的,生产历史,检验,维修和维护(IRM)记录,HSE考虑,与其他设施,技术可行性(包括潜在使用先进技术),监管机构的要求和社会经济考虑因素。本文将研究海底管道退役的细节。它将审查从桌面活动(例如规划和加利人)的程序达到运营活动的程序(例如,流产,冲洗,清洁,去除或离开原位)。讨论了不同的场景,并提出了每个场景的潜在优点和缺点。此外,还提出了一个指导,用于未来的管道退役项目,以遵循合理的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号