首页> 外文会议>IEEE Conference on Computer Communications >Balancing Cost and Dissatisfaction in Online EV Charging under Real-time Pricing
【24h】

Balancing Cost and Dissatisfaction in Online EV Charging under Real-time Pricing

机译:在实时定价下平衡在线EV充电的成本和不满

获取原文

摘要

We consider an increasingly popular demand-response scenario where a user schedules the flexible electric vehicle (EV) charging load in response to real-time electricity prices. The objective is to minimize the total charging cost with user dissatisfaction taken into account. We focus on the online setting where neither accurate prediction nor distribution of future real-time prices is available to the user when making irrevocable charging decision in each time slot. The emphasis on considering user dissatisfaction and achieving optimal competitive ratio differentiates our work from existing ones and makes our study uniquely challenging. Our key contribution is two simple online algorithms with the best possible competitive ratio among all deterministic algorithms. The optimal competitive ratio is upper-bounded by min {√α/pmin, pmax/pmin} and the bound is asymptotically tight with respect to α, where pmax and pmin are the upper and lower bounds of real-time prices and α ≥ pmin captures the consideration of user dissatisfaction. The bounds under small and large values of α suggest the fundamental difference of the problems with and without considering user dissatisfaction. Simulation results based on real-world traces corroborate our theoretical findings and show that the empirical performance of our algorithms can be substantially better than its theoretical worst-case guarantee. Moreover, our algorithms achieve large performance gains as compared to conceivable alternatives. The results also suggest that increasing EV charging rate limit decreases overall cost almost linearly.
机译:我们考虑了越来越受欢迎的需求 - 响应情景,其中用户响应实时电价的柔性电动车(EV)充电负荷。目标是最大限度地减少对用户不满意的总收费成本。我们专注于在线设置,在每次时隙中的不可撤销充电决策时,用户都没有准确的预测和未来实时价格的分布。重点是考虑用户不满和实现最佳竞争比率区分我们现有的工作,并使我们的研究唯一挑战。我们的主要贡献是两个简单的在线算法,所有决定性算法之间具有最佳竞争比率。最佳的竞争比率是MIN {√α/ p的上限 min ,P. max / P. min }并且界限相对于α是渐近的,其中p max 和P. min 是实时价格的上限和下限,α≥P min 捕捉对用户不满的考虑。 α小幅和大值下的界限表明了存在问题的根本差异,而不考虑用户不满。基于现实世界迹线的仿真结果证实了我们的理论调查结果,并表明我们的算法的实证性能可能比其理论最坏情况保证更好。此外,与可想到的替代方案相比,我们的算法达到了大量的性能。结果还表明,越来越多的EV充电率限制几乎线性降低了整体成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号