首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security >The Wrong Question to the Right People. A Critical View of Severity Classification Methods in ATM Experimental Projects
【24h】

The Wrong Question to the Right People. A Critical View of Severity Classification Methods in ATM Experimental Projects

机译:对合适的人来说是错误的问题。 ATM实验项目中严重性分类方法的临界观

获取原文

摘要

The knowledge of operational experts plays a fundamental role in performing safety assessments in safety critical organizations. The complexity and socio-technical nature of such systems produce hazardous situations which require a thorough understanding of concrete operational scenarios and cannot be anticipated by simply analyzing single failures of specific functions. This paper addresses some limitations regarding state-of-the-art safety assessment techniques, with special reference to the use of severity classes associated to specific outcomes (e.g. accident, incident, no safety effect, etc.). Such classes tend to assume a linear link between single hazards considered in isolation and specified consequences for safety, thus neglecting the intrinsic complexity of the systems under analysis and reducing the opportunities for an effective involvement of operational experts. An alternative approach is proposed to overcome these limitations, by allowing operational people to prioritize the severity of hazards observed in concrete operational scenarios and by involving them in the definition of the possible means of mitigation.
机译:业务专家的知识在为安全关键组织的安全评估表演中发挥着重要作用。这种系统的复杂性和社会技术性质产生了危险情况,需要彻底了解具体操作场景,并且无法通过简单地分析特定功能的单一失败来预测。本文涉及最先进的安全评估技术的一些局限性,特别参考与特定结果相关的严重性课程(例如,事故,事件,无安全效果等)。这些类倾向于假设单一危害之间考虑的单一危害之间的线性联系,以及对安全的特定后果,从而忽略了分析中的系统的内在复杂性,并减少了有效参与运营专家的机会。提出一种替代方法,以允许运营人员优先考虑在具体操作情景中观察到的危害的严重程度,并通过涉及可能的缓解手段的定义来克服这些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号