【24h】

Human Factors Analysis for Aviation Accidents and Incidents in Singapore

机译:新加坡航空事故和事故的人为因素分析

获取原文

摘要

The aviation industry is an important sector in contributing to a nation's economy and its growth and development. The continuous improvement in the aviation industry with the adoption of new technology has developed trust and confidence amongst people all over the world. However even with such improvement and technological advances embedded in the aviation industry, accidents still cannot be avoided. An aviation accident is characterized as an incident that is directly related to an aircraft's service. Aviation accidents are often the result of a number of causes and contributory factors, many of which have a human dimension to them. In some cases, human error is a factor in as high as 70% of aircraft accidents (Feggetter 2007). Hence, the challenge for accident investigators is how best to identify and mitigate the causal sequence of events leading up to an accident. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) is a general human error framework originally developed and tested within the USA military as a tool for investigating and analysing human causes of aviation accidents (Li et al. 2008). The applicability of HFACS to the analysis of large-scale datasets of incidents and accidents has also been demonstrated in both civil and military aviation environments in Taiwan, India and Australia. Further, this framework has been extended and adapted to analyse the underlying human factors causes in accidents involving remotely piloted aircraft, aviation maintenance and railroad accidents. In Asia, Singapore has a strong and robust economy and operates one of the world's most successful and recognisable airlines. It is therefore surprising that little is known about human error in the aviation context. Thus, one purpose of the present study is to assess the utility of the HFACS framework as an error analysis and classification tool for accidents/incidents in the aviation industry in Singapore. Specifically, HFACS will be applied to commercial aviation accident and incident records maintained by the Transportation Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) of the Ministry of Transport (MOT). The TSIB is the air, marine and rail accidents and incidents investigation authority in Singapore. Its mission is to promote transport safety through the conduct of independent investigations into air, marine and rail accidents and incidents. A comprehensive review of 75 accidents and incidents that occurred between October 2000 and December 2019 in Singapore has just been undertaken. This is currently being analysed within a HFACS context and the findings will be reported here. Thus, the utility of the HFACS framework will be appraised, an overview of the 75 accidents will be given, and more specific detail relating to human error will be reported. At a later stage, these findings will be compared with other countries in Asia where similar data is available. Researchers claim that the HFACS framework bridges the gap between theory and practice by providing safety professionals with a theoretical tool for identifying and classifying human errors in aviation mishaps (Wiegmann and Shappell 2001a, b, c). The system focuses on both latent and active failures and their interrelationships, thereby facilitating the identification of the underlying causes of human error. The findings from this research will allow safety managers, administrators and other aviation professionals working in airlines, airports and aviation regulatory organizations to analyse their safety programmes' strengths and weaknesses. This will also contribute to the build-up of a comprehensive database in Southeast Asia. Finally, this study is unprecedented in Singapore and will offer new insights into the nature and trends of human factors in aircraft accidents and incidents.
机译:航空业是一个重要的部门,为国家的经济贡献及其增长和发展。航空业随着新技术的持续改善已经为世界各地的人们发达了信任和信心。然而,即使在航空业中嵌入的这种改进和技术进步,也无法避免事故。航空事故的特征是与飞机服务直接相关的事件。航空事故往往是若干原因和贡献因素的结果,其中许多人对他们具有人力维度。在某些情况下,人为错误是高达50%的飞机事故(Feggetter 2007)的因素。因此,事故调查人员的挑战是如何最好地识别和减轻导致事故的事件的因果序列。人为因素分析和分类系统(HFAC)是最初在美国军队内开发和测试的一般人类错误框架,作为调查和分析人类航空事故的人类原因(Li等人2008)。 HFAC对台湾,印度和澳大利亚的民用和军事航空环境中也证明了HFAC对大规模数据集的分析。此外,该框架已延长,并适合分析涉及远程驾驶飞机,航空维护和铁路事故的事故的潜在人类因素。在亚洲,新加坡具有强大而强劲的经济性,并经营着世界上最成功和最可识别的航空公司之一。因此,它令人惊讶的是,在航空环境中对人为错误知之甚少。因此,本研究的一个目的是评估HFACS框架的效用作为新加坡航空行业事故/事故的误差分析和分类工具。具体而言,HFAC将适用于运输部(MOT)的运输安全调查局(TSIB)维护的商业航空事故和事件记录。 Tsib是新加坡的空中,海洋和铁路事故和事件调查管理局。其使命是通过对空运,海洋和铁路事故和事故进行独立调查来促进运输安全。刚刚开展了对2000年10月至2019年10月至2019年12月期间发生的75项发生的全面审查。目前正在在HFACS背景下进行分析,并将在此报告调查结果。因此,将评估HFACS框架的效用,将给出75条事故的概述,并报告与人体错误有关的更具体的细节。在稍后阶段,这些调查结果将与其他国家的其他国家进行比较,其中有类似的数据。研究人员声称,HFACS框架通过提供具有理论工具的理论和实践之间的差距,用于识别和分类航空中的人为错误(Wiegmann和Shappell 2001a,b,c)。该系统侧重于潜在和主动故障及其相互关系,从而促进了人为错误的潜在原因。本研究的调查结果将允许在航空公司,机场和航空监管机构工作的安全管理人员,管理员和其他航空专业人士分析其安全计划的优势和劣势。这也将有助于在东南亚建立综合数据库的积累。最后,这项研究在新加坡前所未有,并将对飞机事故和事故中人类因素的性质和趋势提供新的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号