首页> 外文会议>AIAA aviation forum >Wind Tunnel Testing of Active Flow Control on High-Lift Common Research Model
【24h】

Wind Tunnel Testing of Active Flow Control on High-Lift Common Research Model

机译:高升力常见研究模型主动流量控制风隧道试验

获取原文

摘要

A 10%-scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL) and an Active Flow Control (AFC) version of the model equipped with a simple-hinged flap (CRM-SHL-AFC) were successfully tested. The tests were performed in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The CRM-HL has a set of 37° inboard and outboard single-element Fowler flaps. The CRM-SHL-AFC has a set of 50° inboard and 55° outboard simple-hinged flaps equipped with integrated modular AFC cartridges on the flap shoulder. Both high-lift configurations share the same 30° slats and engine nacelle. Three new types of AFC devices were examined: the Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), the Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and the High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used a combination of unsteady and steady jets, to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients while minimizing the mass flow usage. Nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow consumption and the power coefficient, which takes account of both supply air pressure and mass flow usage for the actuators, were used for judging the performance efficiency of the AFC devices. A prestall lift performance degradation for the CRM-HL configuration was resolved with a properly placed nacelle chine. The configuration with nacelle chine was chosen as the representative reference conventional high-lift case for comparison with the CRM-SHL-AFC. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment (ΔC_L) was maintained for the entire lift curve over the CRM-SHL-AFC case with no AFC for almost all flow-control cases examined. The lift curve of the reference CRM-HL have a slightly steeper slope compared to those of the CRM-SHL-AFC configurations. The HELP actuation concept was extremely effective in controlling flow separation in the "linear region" of the curves comparing lift coefficient to mass flow rate. The HELP actuation achieved a targeted ΔC_L of 0.50 using a moderate amount of mass flow and supply air pressure. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was able to match or exceed the lift performance of the reference conventional high-lift configuration (i.e., CRM-HL equipped with a nacelle chine), thus meeting the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project goal.
机译:成功测试了10%-creal的高升力版本的常见研究模型(CRM-HL)和有效流量控制(AFC)版本,配备了简单铰接的襟翼(CRM-SHL-AFC)。在NASA Langley研究中心(LARC)的14乘22英尺亚源隧道(14x22)中进行了测试。 CRM-HL具有一套37°内侧和舷外单元素圈襟。 CRM-SHL-AFC具有一套50°内的舷内和55°舷外吊瓣,在襟翼肩上配备了集成的模块化AFC墨盒。两种高升力配置都共用相同的30°板条和发动机机舱。检查了三种新型AFC设备:双排扫描喷射器(DRSW),交流脉冲喷射器(APJ),以及高效率低功耗(帮助)执行器。 DRSWJ和APJ执行器使用了两行不稳定的喷气机,而帮助执行器使用了不稳定和稳定的喷射器的组合,以克服强不利的压力梯度,同时最小化质量流量。喷嘴压力比,质量流量消耗和功率系数考虑到供应气压和致动器的质量流量,用于判断AFC器件的性能效率。用正确放置的机舱Chine解决了CRM-HL配置的Prestall提升性能劣化。选择具有机舱Chine的配置作为代表参考传统的高升力情况,以与CRM-SHL-AFC相比。在CRM-SHL-AFC壳体上保持AFC诱导的提升系数增量(ΔC_L),几乎没有AFC,几乎所有的流量控制案例。与CRM-SHL-AFC配置相比,参考CRM-HL的升力曲线具有略微陡峭的斜率。帮助致动概念在将曲线的“线性区域”中控制比较升力系数与质量流量的“线性区域”的流动分离非常有效。帮助致动使用使用中等量的质量流量和供应空气压力来实现0.50的靶向ΔC_L。配备有助于帮助致动的CRM-SHL-AFC配置能够匹配或超过参考常规高升力配置的提升性能​​(即配备机舱CHINE的CRM-HL),从而满足美国国家航空航天局的高级航空运输技术( AATT)项目目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号