首页> 外文会议>Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on principles of programming languages >Verified Squared: Does Critical Software Deserve Verified Tools?
【24h】

Verified Squared: Does Critical Software Deserve Verified Tools?

机译:已验证平方:关键软件是否应该获得已验证的工具?

获取原文

摘要

The formal verification of programs have progressed tremendously in the last decade. Principled but once academic approaches such as Hoare logic and abstract interpretation finally gave birth to quality verification tools, operating over source code (and not just idealized models thereof) and able to verify complex real-world applications [6, 8, 15, 18]. In this talk, I review some of the obstacles that remain to be lifted before source-level verification tools can be taken really seriously in the critical software industry: not just as sophisticated bug-finders, but as elements of absolute confidence in the correctness of a critical application.
机译:方案的正式核查在过去十年中取得了巨大的进展。原则但是,曾经的学术方法,如Hoare逻辑和抽象解释最终获得了质量验证工具,经营源代码(而不只是其理想化模型),并能够验证复杂的现实应用[6,8,15,18] 。在这次谈话中,我在源级验证工具可以在关键软件行业中真正认真对待仍有待解除的一些障碍:不仅仅是复杂的虫点,而且作为绝对信心对正确的要素关键申请。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号