【24h】

Verified Squared: Does Critical Software Deserve Verified Tools?

机译:验证平方:关键软件应提供验证工具吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The formal verification of programs have progressed tremendously in the last decade. Principled but once academic approaches such as Hoare logic and abstract interpretation finally gave birth to quality verification tools, operating over source code (and not just idealized models thereof) and able to verify complex real-world applications [6, 8, 15, 18]. In this talk, I review some of the obstacles that remain to be lifted before source-level verification tools can be taken really seriously in the critical software industry: not just as sophisticated bug-finders, but as elements of absolute confidence in the correctness of a critical application.
机译:在过去的十年中,对程序的正式验证取得了巨大的进步。原则性的但一旦经过学术研究,例如Hoare逻辑和抽象解释,最终就诞生了质量验证工具,可以对源代码进行操作(而不仅仅是其理想化的模型),并且能够验证复杂的实际应用程序[6、8、15、18] 。在本次演讲中,我回顾了在关键软件行业中真正重视源代码级验证工具之前仍需克服的一些障碍:不仅是复杂的错误发现者,而且是对软件正确性绝对信心的元素。关键的应用程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号