首页> 外文会议>ASSE Professional Development Conference >When the Safety System Fails the Worker: 'Did We Do Our Job?' a Case Study
【24h】

When the Safety System Fails the Worker: 'Did We Do Our Job?' a Case Study

机译:当安全系统失败的工人时:“我们做了我们的工作吗?”案例研究

获取原文

摘要

As safety professionals, we strive to implement a robust safety process in our organizations to maximize worker protection. We sell our philosophy and ideas to senior management, and then work with line management and the work force to develop and implement the safety process. Through this effort, we are likely to accomplish two major objectives. First, we obtain buy-in from line management and the workers, maybe even ownership for the safety process we implement. Second, we increase the likelihood that the hazards (and necessary controls) associated with the work activities performed by our workforce are identified and addressed by the safety process we implement. Our ambition is to maximize safety and health in the work place, and prevent injuries. Realizing this goal improves overall business operations. Petersen suggests an accident is an indication of something wrong in the management system (Petersen, pg 15). Successful organizations operate with the safety process fully integrated into the management system. If the management system fails, the safety process has failed the worker. As safety professionals, we must ask ourselves whether we did our job adequately. The better organizations strive for continuous improvement.
机译:作为安全专业人士,我们努力在我们的组织实施强大的安全过程,以最大限度地提高工人保护。我们向高级管理层销售我们的哲学和想法,然后用线管理和劳动力发展和实施安全过程。通过这项努力,我们可能会完成两个主要目标。首先,我们从生产线管理和工人获得买入,甚至可能是我们实施的安全过程的所有权。其次,我们增加了与我们劳动力所履行的工作活动相关的危险(和必要控制)的可能性,并通过我们实施的安全过程来确定和解决。我们的野心是最大限度地提高工作场所的安全和健康,并防止伤害。意识到这一目标改善了整体业务运营。 Petersen表明,事故表明管理系统中有问题(Petersen,PG 15)。成功的组织在安全过程中运营完全集成到管理系统中。如果管理系统发生故障,则安全过程失败了。作为安全专业人士,我们必须询问自己是否充分地完成了工作。更好的组织争取持续改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号