首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific Oil Gas Conference and Exhibition >Modelling of Drainage Capillary Pressure: A Comparative Study of Various Analytical Capillary Pressure Formulations in Matching Laboratory Results
【24h】

Modelling of Drainage Capillary Pressure: A Comparative Study of Various Analytical Capillary Pressure Formulations in Matching Laboratory Results

机译:排水毛细管压力建模 - 匹配实验室结果中各种分析毛细管压力制剂的对比研究

获取原文

摘要

Capillary pressure relationships (drainage) is of importance in both, reservoir engineering and petrophysics. Reservoir engineers use capillary pressure relationships in reservoir engineering calculations and petrophysicists use such relationships in saturation-height modelling. The overall objective of the study presented is to perform a comparative study of various capillary pressure models commonly used by the petroleum industry and to access their ability to match diverse laboratory data. Over the years many capillary pressure formulations have been proposed to match laboratory data, from the well-known Leverett J-function approach to more recent methods. Generally, formulations may be theoretical, semi-empirical, empirical or statistical basis. The comparative study presented involves the following analytical formulations: modified Leverett J-function, modified Brooks-Corey (MBC), Thomeer, Skelt-Harrison, Lambda (λ) and the more recently established, Modified Carman-Kozeny-Purcell (MCKP) model. Various types of pore structures may be modelled: homogeneous (narrow), broad (poorer sorting) and bimodal (two distinct distributions) where one of the distributions is often related to pore-fill, or a mixture of distribution types. Results presented in this paper compare application of the above-mentioned methods for homogeneous plugs. It is demonstrated that the MCKP method consistently outperforms the other methods and it is the only method that is able to identify the type of pore throat distribution without any further input data. The advantage of the MCKP method is that it does not contain any fitting parameters. The degree of accuracy of the MCKP model is typically R~2 > 0.99. The MCKP model also lends itself very easily to predict capillary pressure relationships from more basic parameters. Presented are examples with data from two Australian fields, one offshore and one onshore.
机译:毛细管压力关系(排水)在水库工程和岩石物理学中具有重要性。储层工程师在水库工程计算中使用毛细管压力关系,岩石物理学家使用这种关系在饱和高度建模中。本研究的总体目的是对石油工业常用的各种毛细管压力模型进行比较研究,并进入其匹配不同实验室数据的能力。多年来,已经提出了许多毛细管压力配方与众所周知的Leverett J功能方法匹配实验室数据,以更新的方法。通常,制剂可以是理论,半经验的,经验或统计基础。提出的比较研究涉及以下分析配方:改进的Leverett J-功能,改装Brooks-Corey(MBC),Thomeer,Skelt-Harrison,Lambda(λ)和最近建立的改进的Carman-Kozeny-Purcell(Mckp)模型。各种类型的孔结构可以是模拟的:均匀(窄),广泛(较差的分选)和双峰(两个不同的分布),其中一个分布通常与孔隙填充或分布类型的混合物相关。本文提出的结果比较适用上述均匀塞的方法。据证明MCKP方法始终如一地优于其他方法,并且它是能够识别孔喉部分布类型而没有任何进一步输入数据的方法。 Mckp方法的优点是它不包含任何拟合参数。 MCKP模型的精度通常是R〜2> 0.99。 Mckp模型也非常容易地引起从更多基本参数的毛细管压力关系。提出的是来自两个澳大利亚领域,一个海上和一个陆上的数据的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号