首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Construction Real Estate Management >A Constructivist-Constructionist Benchmarking Methodology for Achieving Excellence in the Construction Industry
【24h】

A Constructivist-Constructionist Benchmarking Methodology for Achieving Excellence in the Construction Industry

机译:建设主义建构主义基准方法从建筑业实现卓越的基准方法

获取原文

摘要

The search for excellence within the construction industry, specifically the construction industry in the UK, is primarily focused on quality-improvement techniques that often include benchmarking. These benchmarking initiatives are generally incorporated alongside a myriad of Business Improvement concepts and methodologies such as the Balanced Scorecard, Self-assessment techniques and Six Sigma. The concept of benchmarking is often addressed in terms of an instrument consisting of systematic procedures to be followed for improving performance by sharing best practice. It is argued in this paper thatthe focus on outcomes, and processes for delivering these outcomes lacks a conceptual and philosophical basis for the practice of benchmarking to be aligned with current postmodern approaches that can provide the 'space' for generating knowledge on a shared basis. Here, benchmarking is viewed as knowledge sharing/production both in generating knowledge within a disciplinary, primarily cognitive context (Mode 1), and knowledge that is created in broader transdisciplinary, social and economic context (Mode 2). The paper draws upon two bodies of work: Gibbons et al, regarding the 'new production of knowledge' and Gherardi et al. and Wenger's work on communities of practice (CoPs) and social learning systems. The paper argues for a constructivist-constructionist orientation for benchmarking, viewed in terms of engaging in communities that are involved in practitioner-research as committed benchmarking process owners.
机译:在建筑行业中寻找卓越,特别是英国建筑业,主要集中在往往包括基准的质量改进技术。这些基准倡议通常与无数的商业改进概念和方法一起融入,例如平衡记分卡,自我评估技术和六西格玛。基准测试的概念通常在由系统程序组成的仪器方面解决,以便通过分享最佳实践来提高性能。在本文中辩称,重点关注结果,以及提供这些结果的过程缺乏概念性和哲学基础,以便与当前的后现代方法保持一致的基准,以便为“空间”提供以共同的基础产生知识。在这里,基准测试被视为在学科,主要是认知的上下文(模式1)和更广泛的跨学科,社会和经济背景(模式2)中创建的知识中的知识共享/生产。本文借鉴了两个工作机构:Gibbons等,关于“知识的新生产”和Gherardi等。和温格在实践社区的工作(警察)和社会学习系统。本文认为建构主义建构主义师范学校场的基准测试,以参与从业者 - 研究所涉及的基准工艺业主所涉及的社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号