首页> 外文会议>Motorship Propulsion Emissions Conference >A mandatory global system for monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from the EU and IMO
【24h】

A mandatory global system for monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from the EU and IMO

机译:用于监测,报告和核实欧盟和IMO的二氧化碳排放的强制性全球系统

获取原文

摘要

As a contribution towards finding an appropriate global solution for C0_2 monitoring from international shipping European shipowners welcome the Commission's proposal for a Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system of C0_2 emissions from maritime transport. ECSA however believes that any mandatory requirements on MRV for the international shipping sector must be agreed upon at IMO level, as this is the only way of securing a globally harmonised system.ECSA considers that reporting of commercially sensitive cargo information per-ship is premature. Publication of such data would in any case be unwarranted. As a potential way ahead, ECSA recommends an MRV system that solely includes the aggregated data from ships' fuel consumption in combination with distance sailed. This combination will substantiate shipping's advantages as the most energy efficient and environmentally friendly mode of transport and allows correlating the trends of C02 emissions with already available data on world trade.0verall, ECSA believes that the proposed MRV system should ensure that the realities and practicalities of the shipping industry enables a C0_2 monitoring system that is workable both for the industry and for the authorities.The support in principle for an MRV system does not imply that ECSA would accept that MRV were to be used to establish regional Market Based Measures, mandatory application of energy efficiency improvement measures or indexing for existing ships. Whilst acknowledging the expressed long term intention of further improving the environmental performance of theexisting fleet, ECSA considers it premature for the European Union to go along this path. Detailed input values for operational efficiency vary to a degree where any averaging and aggregation would make the result useless. Calculating such gross average indices for operational efficiency would expose the commercial viability of ships in a manner that is unjust and misleading.A transport work value, expressed in CO2 emissions per distance travelled per amount of cargo carried, suggests comparability over a large range of ship types and transport routes. ECSA doubts the validity and feasibility of such a system. Ships operate in an environment which produces many variables that can be under the control of different parties (whether the owner, the technical operator, the commercial operator or the charterer) and which influence its performance. Each individual ship achieves its service and transport performance within an individual transport environment subject to constant variation of economical aspects (fuel price, freight rates), operational aspects (amount of cargo carried, speed, routeing, ballast legs) and environmental aspects (current, weather and sea conditions, winter and ice navigation). These factors would even make it difficult to compare sister ships in the same trades, or seemingly identical voyages of the same ship during different seasons. Any attempt to formulate emissions regulations that ignore the abovementioned facts is therefore bound to be ineffective.ECSA is furthermore concerned about the negative impact the publication of commercially sensitive data would have on shipping companies. Rating of performance of existing ships using variable factors, will lead to unfair comparison of ship operators creating market distortions, as it happens today with the use of certain non-authorised industry ship rating systems. ECSA therefore believes that publication of individual ship's commercial sensitive data is unwarranted.ECSA is also concerned that, even if the vessel operator possesses the operational data that might be required to be recorded or reported under the current version of the Commission's legislative proposal, there are significant complexities and costs that would arise from a mandatory third-party verification of such huge amount of data.Furthermore, ECSA believes that an MRV regulation should apply to ships above a Gr
机译:作为为从国际航运欧式船东监测寻找适当的全球解决方案的贡献欢迎委员会从海运运输中监测,报告和核查(MRV)制度的提案。然而,ECSA认为,必须在IMO水平上达成关于国际航运部门MRV的任何强制性要求,因为这是确保全球统一系统的唯一途径。ECSA认为,报告每艘商业敏感的货物信息为时过早。在任何情况下,这些数据的出版物将被解雇。作为前进的潜在方式,ECSA建议使用Ships'燃油消耗的MRV系统与航行的距离组合。这种组合将证明运输的优势是最能节能和环保的运输方式,并允许将CO2排放的趋势与已有的世界贸易数据相关联。0verall,ECSA认为,拟议的MRV系统应确保航运业的现实和实用性使得能够为行业和当局提供的C0_2监测系统。原则上为MRV系统的支持并不意味着ECSA将接受MRV被用来建立基于区域市场的措施,强制适用能源效率改进措施或现有船舶的索引。虽然承认表达的长期意图进一步提高环境绩效现有的舰队,ECSA考虑了欧盟沿着这条道路迈出的。操作效率的详细输入值因任何平均和聚合而使结果无用的程度也会变化。计算这种运营效率的平均指数将以不公正和误导的方式暴露船舶的商业可行性。运输工作价值,每距离每距离的CO2排放量表达,载于携带的货物量,表明在大量船舶类型和运输路线上的可比性。 ECSA怀疑这种系统的有效性和可行性。船舶在一个环境中运行,这些环境产生了许多可在不同方面的控制下的变量(无论是所有者,技术操作员,商业运营商还是租赁者)并影响其性能。每个单独的船舶在各个运输环境中实现其服务和运输性能,而在经济方面的持续变化(燃料价格,运费),运营方面(货物所携带,速度,途径,镇流器腿)和环境方面(电流,天气和海上条件,冬季和冰航)。这些因素甚至可以使姐妹船在不同季节期间与同一艘船的看似相同的航行难以比较。因此,任何企图制定忽视上述事实的排放法规都必须无效。ECSA还涉及对航运公司出版商业敏感数据的负面影响。使用可变因素的现有船舶性能的评价将导致船舶运营商的不公平比较创造市场扭曲,因为它在今天使用某些未授权的行业船舶评级系统时发生。因此,ECSA认为,单个船舶的商业敏感数据的出版是无理的。ECSA也担心,即使船舶运营商拥有可能需要在委员会立法提案的当前版本或报告的运营数据,从强制性的第三方核查中会出现重大复杂性和成本这么大量的数据。此外,ECSA认为MRV规则应适用于GR上方的船舶

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号