首页> 外文会议>International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue >Performance Evaluation Criteria and Selection Utility Function for Compact Air-to-Refrigerant Heat Exchangers
【24h】

Performance Evaluation Criteria and Selection Utility Function for Compact Air-to-Refrigerant Heat Exchangers

机译:紧凑型空对制冷剂热交换器的性能评估标准和选择实用功能

获取原文

摘要

The issue of Performance Evaluation Criteria (PEC) for Heat eXchangers (HX) is widely discussed in the literature. However, not often is discussed some deeper meanings of each PEC metric and the consequences they potentially have in the design and selection of HX's when using one or another. There are two main evaluation approaches: energy-based and entropy-based PEC's. The main difference between them is that the first objectively compares the quantities of energy coming in and out of the HX, whilst the second quantifies and qualifies all the factors that affect the overall performance. Furthermore, with the advances in computational capabilities and manufacturing technologies, there is an increasing development of novel HX concepts, and large data sets from multi-objective optimization studies. When the options multiply, the more challenging is to compare and select the best alternative. In this paper, we provide a brief review on the existing PEC from the literature. Additionally, we present a set of PEC that purposely addresses the HX performance in a fundamentally consistent way, however general allowing a fair comparison between different HX's. We compare how different metrics affect the outcomes of an optimization and discuss the results. Lastly, we describe a procedure for translating the optimization results into a Multi-Attribute Utility Function that serves for HX selection method, based on existing methods in the engineering decision-making literature. All the analyses presented in this paper are valid for single-phase HX applications using fixed heat transfer rates and fixed heat capacitance rates.
机译:绩效评价标准(PEC)的热交换器(HX)的问题在文献中被广泛讨论。然而,不经常讨论每个PEC指标和后果的一些深层次的含义,他们使用一种或另一种可能时有HX的设计和选择。主要有两种评价方法:能源和基于熵基于PEC的。它们之间的主要区别在于:第一,客观比较能量进出HX的未来的量,而第二量化并有资格所有影响整体性能的因素。此外,在计算能力和制造技术的进步,有来自多目标优化研究的新型HX概念,以及大型数据集的日益发展。当选择乘,更具挑战性的是比较和选择的最佳替代品。在本文中,我们提供从文献中已有PEC一个简要的回顾。此外,我们提出了一套PEC的是故意解决在根本上是一致的方式HX的性能,但是一般允许不同HX的之间进行公平的比较。我们比较不同的指标如何影响优化的结果和讨论结果。最后,我们描述了翻译的优化结果为投放的HX选择方法的基础上,在工程决策文献现有方法多属性效用函数的过程。所有在本文所提出的分析适用于使用固定的传热率和热固定电容率单相HX应用程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号