首页> 外文会议>Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences >Verdict Examination of Dishonorable Discharge as PNS Due to Criminal Act of the Office in State Administrative Court
【24h】

Verdict Examination of Dishonorable Discharge as PNS Due to Criminal Act of the Office in State Administrative Court

机译:判决国家行政法院办公室刑事法案的刑事不尽放电作为PNS的审查

获取原文

摘要

Dishonorable discharge as Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) who perform criminal act of the office according to court with permanent legal force's decision, had once again become a national issue of law during the entire year of 2018. The resolution of aforementioned issue has involved many relevant institutions such as BKN (National Civil Service Agency), Kemenpan RB (Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform), Kemendagri (Ministry of Home Affairs), and KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission). After the publication of joint decision between Mendagri, Menpan RB, and chief of BKN (SKB Tiga Lembaga) which ordered Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian (PPK) to hand down PTDH PNS (Dishonorable Discharge as Civil Servant) towards any PNS (Civil Servant) who performed criminal act of the office based on the decision by PBHT (Court with Permanent Legal Force), in 1st of August2019, which had been handed down to 1.906 PNS (88%) out of 2.357 PNS in active duty. The publication of SKB Tiga Lembaga (joint decision of three institutions), have caused controversy among scholars, practitioners, and law experts concerning the interpretation of article 87 clause (4) letter b UU No. 5/2014 about Aparatur Sipil Negara (UU ASN). There are debates concerning the interpretation of law article 87 clauses (4) letter b, implication of PTDH as PNS, and the status of PNS who had been reactivated by PPK (Staff Development Officer) before UU ASN (civil servant acts) was implemented. A variety of parties that felt like their rights were aggrieved had filed constitutional examination of article 87 of UU ASN to the Constitutional Court. Most civil servants that had been dishonorably discharged had also filed a lawsuit to Pengadilan Tata Usaha (PTUN) to receive legal certainty and justice. And yet unlike the controversy of SKB Tiga Lembaga's publication, PTDH PNS in PTUN (State Administrative Court) was rarely investigated throughly. Even though the legal issues that appear in PTUN's examination and verdict towards PTDH PNS verdict is far more fundamental and strategic in deciding the progress of Indonesian administrative law, which already found its basis in UU No. 30/2014 about government administration.
机译:作为Pegawai Negeri Sipil(PNS)的不诚实的卸货根据与常设法律部队决定的法院执行办公室的犯罪行为,再次成为2018年全年的国家法律问题。上述问题的决议涉及许多相关的问题BKN(国家公务员署),KEMENPAN RB(行政和官僚机构),KEMENDAGRI(民政事务部),KPK(腐败根除委员会)等机构。在孟加拉多,Menpan RB和BKN(SKB Tiga Lembaga的主任之间的联合决定出版后,订购了Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian(PPK)向执行的PTDH PNS(作为公务员)的任何PNS(公务员)进行处理根据PBHT(法院与永久法律部队)的决定,办公室犯罪行为,2019年8月1日,在现役的2.357 PNS中被交给了1.906 PNS(88%)。 SKB Tiga Lembaga(三家机构的联合决定)出版,造成了关于解释第87条(4)字母B uu No.5/2014关于Aparatur Sipil Negara(UU Asn)的争论)。有关法律解释的辩论第87条条款(4)字母B,PTDH的含义作为PNS的含义,以及在UU ASN(公务员行为)之前被PPK(员工发展官)重新激活的PNS的地位。感到威胁的各种缔约方受到侵害的委员会向宪法法院提出了对UU Asn第87条的宪法审查。被勒索地解雇的大多数公务员还向彭达兰塔塔·萨拉哈(PTUN)提起诉讼,以获得法律确定性和正义。然而,与SKB Tiga Lembaga的出版物的争议不同,PTUN中的PTDH PNS(国家行政法院)很少被调查。尽管PTUN审查和判决的法律问题,但在PTDH PNS判决中决定印度尼西亚行政法的进展是更重要的,而且战略性是在乌u第30/2014号关于政府行政管理局的基础上的基础和战略性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号