首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law and Governance >Implementation of Common Law Doctrine in Indonesian Law of Obligation
【24h】

Implementation of Common Law Doctrine in Indonesian Law of Obligation

机译:在印度尼西亚义务法中实施普通法主义

获取原文

摘要

Indonesia as a country which adopts civil law system has a number of differences with common law countries. However, by the time the differences become narrow through the adoption of several common law doctrines by civil law countries including Indonesia. One of the doctrines is undue influence which has been applied in Indonesia through court decisions. Such doctrine is not explicitly stated in the Indonesian Civil Code. This paper will explain the Implementation of common law doctrine in Indonesia where the Civil Code has not been changed since 1848, especially in the field of law of obligations. Court decisions become primary resources as a tool in conducting analysis. The results show that common law doctrine is not implemented directly in Indonesia but through the Netherlands. This raises a number of similarities and differences. The reasons why the common law doctrine is not directly Implemented in Indonesia and the similarities and differences of such doctrine will be discussed in this paper.
机译:印度尼西亚作为采用民法制度的国家与普通法国家有很多差异。然而,通过在包括印度尼西亚包括印度尼西亚的民法国家的几个普通法学说,差异变得狭隘。其中一位教义是通过法院决定在印度尼西亚应用的过度影响。印度尼西亚民法典没有明确说明这种学说。本文将解释印度尼西亚的普通法学说的实施,自1848年以来尚未改变民法典,特别是在义务法则领域。法院决定成为进一步分析工具的主要资源。结果表明,普通法决定尚未直接在印度尼西亚直接实施,而是通过荷兰。这提出了许多相似性和差异。普通法学说未直接在印度尼西亚直接实施的原因,并将在本文中讨论此类学说的相似之处和差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号