【24h】

Comparison between qualitative and quantitative rockfall risk methods for a hazardous road stretch

机译:危险公路伸展定性和定量岩石风险方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

In order to compare rockfall risk values characterizing road sections affected by several rockfalls, two procedures have been used: the modified Colorado Rockfall Hazard Rating System (mCRHRS) and the ROckfall risk MAnagement (RO.MA.) method. The first one is a qualitative method mainly based on a heuristic assessment and the second is a quantitative approach taking into account the occurrence probability of severe negative events. Even though the qualitative approach is not consistent with the definition of risk used in the quantitative procedure, we proved that mCRHRS ratings are comparable with risk values, expressed as probability of death of at least one occupant of a vehicle (fatal accident) exposed to the rockfall hazard per year.
机译:为了比较岩石风险价值,表征受几个岩石影响的道路部分,已经使用了两种程序:改进的科罗拉多岩石危险评级系统(MCRHR)和岩石风险管理(RO.MA.)方法。 第一个是主要基于启发式评估的定性方法,第二种是考虑到严重负面事件的发生概率的定量方法。 尽管定性方法与定量程序中使用的风险的定义不一致,但我们证明了MCRHR评级与风险价值相当,表达为至少一个乘员(致命事故)暴露于的车辆(致命事故)的死亡概率 每年岩石危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号