首页> 外文会议>EVER 2013;International Conference and Exhibition on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies >A Comparative Study of Different Control Strategies of On-Board Battery Chargers for Battery Electric Vehicles
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Different Control Strategies of On-Board Battery Chargers for Battery Electric Vehicles

机译:电池电动汽车电池电池充电器不同控制策略的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

On-Board Battery Charger is one of the key components required for the emergence and acceptance of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs). The control strategy of the battery charger plays an important role in the development of BEVs. Therefore, the proper selection of this control strategy can significantly improve the performance of the BEVs during charging mode from the grid. In this paper, a comparative study of different control strategies of on-board battery chargers for BEVs is presented. In this research, three control strategies are designed and applied to control the power flow of the onboard battery charger during charging mode from the ac grid. These control strategies are hysteresis current control (HCC), Proportional-Integral Control (PIC) and Proportional-Resonant Control (PRC). These control strategies are designed and analyzed by using MATLAB/Simulink. The simulation and experimental results are provided.
机译:板载充电器是电池电动车(BEV)的出现和接受所需的关键部件之一。 电池充电器的控制策略在BEV的发展中起着重要作用。 因此,对来自电网的充电模式期间,正确选择该控制策略可以显着提高BEV的性能。 本文提出了对贝夫载电池充电器不同控制策略的比较研究。 在本研究中,设计了三种控制策略,并在从AC电网上充电模式期间控制车载电池充电器的电力流量。 这些控制策略是滞后电流控制(HCC),比例积分控制(PIC)和比例谐振控制(PRC)。 通过使用MATLAB / SIMULINK设计和分析这些控制策略。 提供了模拟和实验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号