首页> 外文会议>World congress on ergonomics >The effectiveness of ergonomic workplace interventions on low back pain and neck pain; a systematic review
【24h】

The effectiveness of ergonomic workplace interventions on low back pain and neck pain; a systematic review

机译:人体工程学工作场所干预对低腰疼痛和颈部疼痛的有效性; 系统评价

获取原文

摘要

Both low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are major occupational health problems with considerable consequences for workers, employers, and society. Ergonomic interventions (physical and organisational) aim to prevent or reduce LBP and NP among workers. We conducted a systematic review of these RCTs. The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Occupational Health Field were checked from September 1988 to September 2008. Two reviewers independently screened 3067 abstracts and assessed the risk of bias of 10 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed. Levels of evidence were classified using the GRADE system. Seven RCTs had a low risk and three a high risk of bias. The results showed low to moderate quality evidence that physical and organisational ergonomic interventions were not more effective than no ergonomic intervention on short and long term LBP and NP incidence/prevalence, short and long term LBP intensity, and short term NP intensity. There was low quality evidence that a physical ergonomic intervention (e.g. arm board) was significantly more effective on the reduction of NP intensity at the long term than no ergonomic intervention. The results, however, cannot be generalised towards all working populations. Furthermore, most other studies were on NP, conducted among office workers and evaluated workstation adjustments. Moreover, the number of studies was limited, and populations, interventions, controls and outcomes were heterogeneous.
机译:腰痛(LBP)和颈部疼痛(NP)都是主要的职业健康问题,对工人,雇主和社会相当多的后果。人体工程学干预(物理和组织)旨在预防或减少工人之间的LBP和NP。我们对这些RCT进行了系统审查。从1988年9月到2008年9月到2008年9月,从1988年9月到2008年9月,检查了PubMed,Embase,Psychinfo,Central和Cochrane职业健康领域的数据库。两位审稿人独立筛选了3067个摘要,并评估了符合纳入标准的10个RCT的偏见风险。随后,提取数据,进行META分析。使用年级系统分类证据水平。七个rct风险低,偏差有三大风险。结果表明,适度的质量证据表明,身体和组织人体工程学干预措施并不比对短期和长期LBP和NP发病率/流行,短期和长期LBP强度和短期NP强度无符合人体工程学干预。质量证据具有低质量的证据,即物体工程学干预(例如,ARM板)在长期内没有符合人体工程学干预的长期降低NP强度的有效。然而,结果不能推广所有工作人群。此外,大多数其他研究都在办公室工作人员之间进行了NP,并评估了工作站调整。此外,研究的数量有限,群体,干预,对照和结果是异质的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号