首页> 外文会议>Annual conference the International Society for the Systems Sciences >FROM EVOLUTIONARY CONSCIOUSNESS TO CONSCIOUS EVOLUTION.ARE WE IN CONTROL?
【24h】

FROM EVOLUTIONARY CONSCIOUSNESS TO CONSCIOUS EVOLUTION.ARE WE IN CONTROL?

机译:从进化意识到有意识的进化。我们控制着什么?

获取原文

摘要

Some implicit assumptions used in the Conference Theme are discussed, before to use them to elaborate the paper, such as: – What does it mean the reference to we? – What does it mean being in control (not only in cybernetic way)? – What is intended for globalization? Distinction is introduced between single conscious agents, systems of conscious agents, and emergent we, as collective entity (reference is made Collective Beings (complex, multidimensional societies to be studied with multiple, systemic knowledge) assumed to have collective consciousness. Focus of the paper is on the issue of being in control. This issue is considered from a systemic approach, referred to the ability to design, to manage emergent processes of development. Global control for social systems is not assumed in cybernetic way, but based on ethics, on ethical behaviors having self-organization capabilities inside, that’s design social process of emergence. Global and national economies are politically driven while consensus is more and more manufactured and driven by large corporations, that by agents composing local systems and the emergent global one. In such a framework development is not designed in an aware, global (in time and space), complex process, but as consequence of local growing processes. Distinction between growth and development is discussed. How to induce or design sustainable development (in short, a process is said to be sustainable when it consumes in time less of what may be produced by the system in which it takes place) in such a context? Two crucial and culminating questions to be considered are: May sustainable development be emergent? Or may it only be rules-driven (referring to cybernetic control, planning vs. designing, ability to manage emergence)? The approach introduced in the paper is relevant in order both to realize what a process of globalization is and how to distinguish between making it emergent, managing it, and controlling it.
机译:讨论了会议主题中使用的一些隐含假设,然后才能使用它们来详细阐述纸张,例如: - 对我们的参考是什么意思? - 控制中的意思是什么(不仅在网络学者的方式)? - 全球化的是什么?在单一意识的药剂,有意识的药剂,意识的系统之间引入不同的区别,并作为集体实体(参考是集体生物(复杂,多维社会,以多元化的多维社会进行了学习),假设具有集体意识。论文的重点是在控制的问题上。从系统方法中考虑了这个问题,提到了设计的能力,管理紧急进程的发展过程。网络冒险方式没有假设社会系统的全球控制,但基于道德,但基于道德内部具有自组织能力的道德行为,这是设计社会的出现过程。全球和国家经济在政治上推动,而共识是越来越多的公司制造,由大公司制造,由撰写本地系统和紧急全球的代理商而导致的。在这样框架开发不是在AIVIPN,Global(时间和空间),复杂的过程中设计的,但结果当地生长过程的CE。讨论了增长和发展之间的区别。如何诱导或设计可持续发展(简而言之,当它及时消耗时,据说一个过程是可持续的,在这种情况下,它可能会产生的系统所在的系统)?要考虑的两个至关重要的问题是:可持续发展可能是紧急的吗?或者愿它只是规则驱动的(指的是网络感受,计划与设计,管理出现的能力)?本文介绍的方法是相关的,以实现全球化过程以及如何区分它的紧急,管理和控制它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号