【24h】

Understanding the Cognitive Demands of the Purdue Pegboard Test: An fNIRs Study

机译:了解PUTDUE PEG板测试的认知需求:FNIR研究

获取原文

摘要

To evaluate manual dexterity in clinical settings Purdue Pegboard test (PPT) is widely used and consists of four uni- and bi-manual sub-tests. The objective of this study is to deep dive into PPT and parse out the cognitive component of the subtests using functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). The prefrontal cortex (PFC) of 16 participants was assessed using fNIRS technique while performing PPT. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed on average AHbR and AHbO in PFC regions (left DLPFC, left vmPFC, right vmPFC, right DLPFC). A Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons. Results from both outcome measures taken together showed that assembly sub-task uses significantly higher resources in the left PFC. The findings can be summarized as follows: PPT measures more than manual dexterity. Subtask complexity affects the cognitive demands in the PFC. The Assembly may be the most sensitive subtest to the changes in PFC activity.
机译:为了评估临床环境中的手动灵活性PUTDUE PEG板测试(PPT)被广泛使用,包括四个单手和双手动子测试。 本研究的目的是深入潜入PPT并使用近红外光谱(FNIR)使用功能的功能释放子测试的认知组分。 在执行PPT的同时使用FNIR技术评估16个参与者的前额叶皮质(PFC)。 重复措施单向ANOVA是在PFC地区的平均AHBR和AHBO上进行的单向ANOVA(左DLPFC,左VMPFC,右翼VMPFC,右侧DLPFC)。 使用Bonferroni校正来解释多种比较。 两种结果措施的结果显示,组装子任务在左侧PFC中使用了更高的资源。 调查结果可以概括如下:PPT措施比手动灵巧更多。 子任务复杂性影响PFC中的认知需求。 组件可以是最敏感的子测试到PFC活动的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号