首页> 外文会议>SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition >Novel Method for Estimating SHmax in Naturally Fractured Formations Using DFIT Data: Case Study on Unconventional Shale Gas
【24h】

Novel Method for Estimating SHmax in Naturally Fractured Formations Using DFIT Data: Case Study on Unconventional Shale Gas

机译:使用DFIT数据在天然骨折地层中估算Shmax的新方法:案例研究非传统页岩气

获取原文

摘要

Maximum horizontal stress (SHmax or SH) and associated horizontal stress anisotropy are some of the essential inputs for drilling and completion optimization such as 3D geomodel and geomechanical model building, drilling mud design and well trajectory analysis, solid production prediction, sweet spot identification in tight/shale plays (i.e. low stress anisotropy as well as high brittleness), and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing design optimization with stress shadowing analysis (e.g. well spacing, fracturing stage spacing, injection rate, fracturing fluid, proppant, etc.). Minifrac/Diagnostic Fluid Injection Test (DFIT) prior to hydraulic fracturing can provide essential reservoir information, such as closure pressure (e.g. minimum horizontal stress, Shmin or Sh), formation pressure, and effective permeability from the G-function analysis. Nolte and Smith (1981) identified Pressure Dependent Leak-off (PDL) behavior in the G-function analysis, and defined PDL net pressure to estimate SHmax associated with small fissure opening along the main hydraulic fracture during the Minifrac/ DFIT. The definition might be suitable for estimating SHmax for non-fractured formations such as conventional ductile sandstones, which could create small fissure openings (e.g. cm size) along the main hydraulic fracture. However, in conventional and unconventional fractured formations such as fractured carbonates, tight sandstones, and shales, the methodology was not applicable because of limitation in the assumptions, which excluded interaction with existing natural fractures (i.e. natural fracture opening during the Minifrac/DFIT). A novel methodology has been developed to estimate SHmax in conventional and unconventional fractured formations from Minifrac/DFIT field measurements. The SHmax Estimation from DFIT method (SHED) is considered more direct compared to the existing methods, since the common industry-accepted methods, such as the image log method from breakouts and the poroelastic horizontal strain method, require Shmin inputs from Minifrac/DFIT tests, additional logs such as image logs and sonic logs, and additional image and geomechanical analyses to define SHmax. Whereas, SHED only requires Minifrac/DFIT test data, typical G-function analysis, and natural fracture patterns from existing geological maps and other inputs, such as seismic surveys and Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) analysis. SHED has been validated and applied in several unconventional shale gas fields utilizing available Minifrac/DFIT field measurements.
机译:最大水平应力(SHMAX或SH)和相关的水平应力各向异性是钻井和完成优化的一些必要输入,如3D地理模德和地质力学模型建筑,钻井泥浆设计和井展分析,坚固的生产预测,紧密的甜蜜点鉴定/页岩扮演(即低应力各向异性以及高脆性),以及具有应力遮蔽分析的多级液压压裂设计优化(例如井间距,压裂阶段间隔,注射率,压裂液,支撑剂等)。液压压裂前的Minifrac /诊断流体喷射试验(DFIT)可以提供必要的储层信息,例如闭合压力(例如,最小水平应力,Shmin或Sh),形成压力和来自G函数分析的有效渗透性。 NOLTE和SMITH(1981)鉴定了G函数分析中的压力依赖性泄漏(PDL)行为,并限定了PDL净压力,以估计与MINIFRAC / DFIT期间沿主液压断裂的小裂隙开口相关的SHMAX。该定义可能适用于估计用于非裂缝形成的Shmax,例如常规的延展岩砂岩,其沿着主液压骨折产生小裂缝(例如CM尺寸)。然而,在常规和非常规的裂缝形成如裂缝碳酸盐,紧密的砂岩和Shales中,由于假设的限制,该方法不适用于与现有的自然骨折的相互作用(即MiniFRAC / DFIT期间的自然骨折开口)。已经开发了一种新的方法来估算来自Minifrac / DFIT现场测量的常规和非常规的骨折地层中的Shmax。与现有方法相比,DFIT方法(SHED)的SHMAX估计被认为是更直接的,因为常见的行业接受的方法,例如来自突破和多孔级水平应变法的图像日志方法,需要来自Minifrac / DFIT测试的Shmin输入,其他日志,如图像日志和声音日志以及其他图像和地质力学分析以定义Shmax。然而,SHED仅需要MINIFRAC / DFIT测试数据,来自现有地质地图和其他输入的典型G函数分析和自然骨折模式,例如地震调查和离散断裂网络(DFN)分析。棚屋已被验证并应用于利用可用的Minifrac / DFIT现场测量的几种非常规体气田。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号