首页> 外文会议>SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition >Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multi-Component Hydrocarbon Additives for Bitumen Recovery by Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multi-Component Hydrocarbon Additives for Bitumen Recovery by Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage

机译:蒸汽辅助重力排水对单组分和多组分烃添加剂的有效性的比较评价

获取原文

摘要

The inherently high viscosity of bitumen makes SAGD the ideal technology for in-situ recovery of these unconventional hydrocarbon deposits. Its conceptual simplicity and proven performance in the field have directed research to explore new opportunities to further improve its recovery efficiency and minimise its environmental footprint. Solvent addition to steam in a SAGD process makes the thermal and solvent dilution effects on oil viscosity act together in improving the bitumen recovery. Various experimental, numerical and pilot studies have shown the incremental benefit of solvent co-injection in accelerating the oil recovery at reduced steam-oil ratio compared to steam alone injection. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of different single-component and multi-component additives for improving the SAGD performance. Among the various process variables, the optimal solvent design and the injection pressure play influential roles in determining the process efficiency, as they directly affect the phase behavior of the system. This paper uses numerical simulation to examine the solvent-SAGD mechanisms and presents a comparative analysis of single and multi-component solvent injection at low and high operating pressures. A lab scale physical model saturated with Athabasca bitumen, used in an earlier experimental study, was adapted to a simulation model for this purpose. After tuning the numerical model by history matching the physical model experiments, it was used to compare the benefits of co-injecting different solvents with steam at two different operating pressures. A range of single component solvents (C4, C5 and C6) and a multi - component gas condensate were aevaluated for low and high-pressure injection scenarios. The results show that all tested solvents reduce the steam oil ratio and enhance the rate of oil production. The relative performance of different solvents is affected by the innate bitumen viscosity and the operating pressure. With lower bitumen viscosity, C4-steam co-injection outperformed C5, C6 and gas-condensate addition for both low- and high-pressure ES-SAGD cases. However, the performance of heavier solvents was better at higher operating pressures due to their relative ease of condensation, which enhances their interactions with bitumen.
机译:沥青的固有高粘度使SAGD成为原位恢复这些非常规烃沉积物的理想技术。其在该领域的概念简洁性和经过验证的表现都有针对研究,探索进一步提高其恢复效率并最大限度地减少其环境足迹的新机会。在SAGD过程中蒸汽的溶剂,使热和溶剂稀释作用对油粘度的作用在一起改善沥青回收。与单独注射单独注射相比,各种实验性,数值和试点研究表明溶剂共注入在减少蒸汽 - 油比下加速油回收的增量益处。这项工作的目的是评估不同单组分和多组分添加剂以改善SAGD性能的有效性。在各种过程变量中,最佳溶剂设计和注射压力在确定过程效率时起着有影响力的作用,因为它们直接影响系统的相位行为。本文采用数值模拟来检查溶剂-SAGD机构,并在低和高操作压力下呈现单组分溶剂注射的比较分析。在早期的实验研究中使用的具有Athabasca沥青饱和的实验室规模物理模型适用于此目的的仿真模型。在通过符合物理模型实验匹配的历史调整数值模型之后,它用于比较在两个不同的操作压力下将不同溶剂共注入不同溶剂的益处。一系列单组分溶剂(C4,C5和C6)和多组分气体冷凝物被评估为低压和高压注射场景。结果表明,所有测试的溶剂都会降低蒸汽油比,提高油生产速率。不同溶剂的相对性能受先天沥青粘度和操作压力的影响。对于低压和高压ES-SAGD病例,沥青粘度较低,C4-蒸汽共注入优于C5,C6和气体冷凝物。然而,由于它们相对容易的缩合,较重的溶剂的性能在更高的操作压力下更好,这提高了它们与沥青的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号