首页> 外文会议>SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition >Validation of Wax Deposition Models Using Field Data of Western Onshore, India
【24h】

Validation of Wax Deposition Models Using Field Data of Western Onshore, India

机译:使用印度西部陆上现场数据验证蜡沉积模型

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Crude oil samples were collected from three-buried gathering lines of Cambay Basin and were characterized in Drilling Cementation and Stimulation (DCS) Research Center, PDPU for their hydrodynamic (Viscosity, Density) and thermal (Specific heat, thermal conductivity) properties along with solubility curve (WAT, pour point and precipitation curve) at Gujarat Energy Research Management Institute (GERMI), PDPU. Theoretical wax mass fluxes for four available wax deposition models were computed using the characterized properties of crude oil samples. Field wax mass fluxes were computed based on field data obtained from the gathering lines and were compared with the theoretical wax mass fluxes. The field data for both 2 km and 5 km long 8 inch ID gathering lines indicated that the crude oil in these pipelines was flowing under laminar flow regime, while for 25km 8 inch ID gathering line it indicated a turbulent flow condition. This leads us to conclude that the presumption of only turbulent flow condition prevails is a myth; both laminar and turbulent flow conditions can occur. Furthermore, a wax mass flux analysis revealed that field wax mass fluxes for gathering lines with laminar flow regime (Re = 200 to 2300) is in good agreement with Film Mass Transfer (FMT) model, while the predictions from Equilibrium Model (EM) and Matzain models are in good agreement with the field data of gathering line with turbulent flow condition (Re = 5400). These agreements are because, for laminar flow case Chilton-Colburn analogy (no-precipitation case) is satisfied which means no precipitation occurs in the mass transfer boundary layer and large amount of wax is deposited radially in the pipe. While, for turbulent flow conditions, the concentration profile is dependent on temperature profile and complete precipitation or instantaneous precipitation occurs in the mass transfer boundary layer. In our study, we made every attempt to obtain reliable field data for comparison with the existing models. The four unique field cases presented here would be useful to researchers in validating their models. In addition, it made us realize that wax deposition is not only an offshore flow assurance problem but also a major flow assurance problem for onshore operations.
机译:从凸盆盆地的三个埋藏的聚集线收集原油样品,其特征在于钻井胶粘剂和刺激(DCS)研究中心,PDPU用于其流体动力学(粘度,密度)和热(比热导电性)性能以及溶解度古吉拉特能源研究管理研究所(Germi),PDPU曲线(Wat,倾点和降水曲线)。使用原油样品的特征性能计算四种可用蜡沉积模型的理论蜡质量助熔剂。基于从聚集线获得的现场数据计算现场蜡质量助熔剂,并与理论蜡质量助熔剂进行比较。 2公里和5公里长的8英寸ID收集线的现场数据表明,这些管道中的原油在层流状态下流动,而25km 8英寸ID收集线,表示湍流条件。这使我们得出结论,只有湍流条件的推定普遍存在一个神话;可以发生层流和湍流条件。此外,蜡质量通量分析显示,用于用层流变管(Re = 200至2300)的用于聚集线的蜡质量助量与薄膜传质(FMT)模型很好,而来自均衡模型(EM)和均衡的预测Matzain模型与带有湍流条件的收集线(RE = 5400)的野外数据一致。这些协议是因为,对于层流案例,满足了辛尔顿 - COLBurn类比(无沉淀壳),这意味着在传质边界层中不发生沉淀,并且在管中径向沉积大量的蜡。虽然对于湍流条件,浓度曲线取决于温度曲线,并且在传质边界层中发生完全沉淀或瞬时沉淀。在我们的研究中,我们每次都尝试获得可靠的现场数据,以便与现有模型进行比较。这里提出的四个独特的现场案例对于验证其模型的研究人员来说是有用的。此外,它使我们意识到蜡沉积不仅是海上流量保证问题,而且是陆上运营的主要流量保证问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号