首页> 外文会议>International Conference of Planning in the Era of Uncertainty >Risk Management of Flood Disaster (A Case Study of Kendal River)
【24h】

Risk Management of Flood Disaster (A Case Study of Kendal River)

机译:洪水灾害风险管理(肯德尔河案例研究)

获取原文

摘要

Kendal River, which runs through the city of Kendal, often overflows causing flood for the immediate areas. This study uses the concept of risk management aimed at relevant stakeholders. Data analysis of this study applied the Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) method to describe each classification of risk sources to risk sub-classification. The results depicted that there were 20 (twenty) risks of causing flooding in Kendal City, with 5 (five) risks being the main cause. According to the Central Java Provincial Government, there was a 35% risk at the extreme level, 60% at the high level, and 5% at the middle level. On the scale of risk acceptance, there were 35% classified as unacceptable, and 65% classified as unexpected. According to the Kendal District Government, there was a 60% risk at extreme levels and 40% at high levels. On the risk acceptance scale, there were 60% classified as unacceptable and 40% classified as unexpected. The results of this study expected to provide a guideline for stakeholders in risk response according to their role both at the Provincial Government and District Government levels based on priority scales.
机译:肯德尔河流通过肯德尔市运行,往往溢出造成洪水为即时地区。本研究采用了针对相关利益攸关方的风险管理概念。本研究的数据分析应用了风险击穿结构(RBS)方法来描述风险源的每个分类,以风险分类。结果表明,肯德城市造成洪水的20个(二十)件风险,有5(五)的风险是主要原因。根据中爪哇省政府的说法,在极端水平的风险下有35%,高水平60%,中间级别为5%。在风险验收的规模上,35%的归类为不可接受,65%归类为意外。据肯德地区政府称,极端水平的风险60%,高水平40%。在风险验收规模上,60%的分类为不可接受,40%归类为意外。本研究的结果预计为根据优先级的省政府和地区政府水平的作用,为风险反应的利益攸关方提供指导方针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号