首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Systems >An analysis of Industry’s perspective and determinants influencing elasticity of electricity demand in context of cross subsidy in India: Taking case of Rajasthan and Haryana states
【24h】

An analysis of Industry’s perspective and determinants influencing elasticity of electricity demand in context of cross subsidy in India: Taking case of Rajasthan and Haryana states

机译:对印度交叉补贴背景影响电力需求弹性的行业视角和决定因素分析:以拉贾斯坦和哈里亚纳州国家为例

获取原文

摘要

This paper makes an effort to present the factors which could influence cross-subsidy elasticity of electricity demand and provides an assessment of industry perspective towards the cross-subsidy structure in electricity tariff in India. For the same, 38 no of industries from States Rajasthan and Haryana were surveyed. After analysis of collected data from the survey, paper concludes that though some industries have shifted partially to other power supply options, there are still a significant number of industries which are dissatisfied but have not moved away from utilities due to combination of factors such as cross subsidy surcharge, high capex requirement for setting up captive power plant, high cost of power generation, and hurdles in getting open access. However, these industries could be “at risk” category for the utilities as they could potential migrate if some of these factors get relaxed in the near future. Furthermore, this paper finds that there are some industries which are not even aware of other power supply options and could be in the “at risk” category. This paper suggests that as industries are high revenue consumers, utility and policymaker should consider all ill effects of cross-subsidy structure on utilities while drafting tariff policies.
机译:本文努力展示可能影响电力需求交叉补贴弹性的因素,并对印度电力关税交叉补贴结构进行评估。同样,调查了来自rajasthan和哈里亚纳邦的38个行业。在分析调查中的收集数据之后,纸张结论认为,虽然一些行业已部分转移到其他电力供应方案,但仍有大量不满的行业,但由于交叉等因素的组合,尚未离开公用事业补贴附加费,建立俘获电厂,发电成本高的高公范要求,以及开放式接入的障碍。然而,这些行业可以是公用事业的“危险”类别,因为如果其中一些因素在不久的将来放松,他们可能会迁移。此外,本文发现有一些行业甚至没有意识到其他电源选项,并且可能处于“风险”类别中。本文认为,随着行业的高收入消费者,效用和政策制造商应考虑交叉补贴结构对公用事业的所有不良影响,同时起草关税政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号