首页> 外文会议>Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility >Smart Infrastructure for Shared Mobility
【24h】

Smart Infrastructure for Shared Mobility

机译:用于共享移动性的智能基础设施

获取原文

摘要

Micromobility has emerged as a green mode of transport, which offers an innovative way to handle persistent traffic planning problems such as the last-mile connections with public transit. The integration of micromobility in urban infrastructure is a key challenge faced by public authorities, policy and urban planners. In this paper we present the results of a face-to-face street travel survey among e-scooter users in Paris about infrastructure-related issues. The great majority of the respondents are not owners of e-scooters, but they use the free-floating electric scooters (FFES), which is an increasingly popular shared mobility scheme. The responses have been analyzed statistically and crosstabulations have been produced. They demonstrate that the users perceive riding on the cycle lane, the sidewalk (excluding cycle lane) and the sidewalk on a cycle lane as safe. On the contrary, they perceive as less safe driving the e-scooters on the cycle lane, the shared lane for bus/taxi/bicycle and the mixed traffic lane. Nonetheless, it is found that the users drive faster at the types of road infrastructure, which they consider less safe.
机译:微生物被出现为绿色的运输方式,它提供了一种处理持久交通规校问题的创新方法,例如与公共交通的最后一英里连接。综合在城市基础设施中的融合是公共当局,政策和城市规划者面临的关键挑战。在本文中,我们展示了关于基础设施相关问题的巴黎的电子踏板车用户面对面的街道旅行调查结果。大多数受访者不是电子摩托车的所有者,但他们使用自由浮动电动滑板车(FFES),这是一种越来越受欢迎的共享移动方案。统计学上已经分析了响应,并且已经产生了叙述性。他们证明,用户在循环通道上骑在循环通道上,人行道(不包括循环道)和循环通道上的人行道上的安全性。相反,他们认为驾驶循环道上的电子滑板车,乘坐公共汽车/出租车/自行车的共用车道和混合交通车道的安全道。尽管如此,我们发现用户在道路基础设施的类型中驾驶更快,他们认为不太安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号