首页> 外文会议>Regional Conference of the Polymer Processing Society >Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers
【24h】

Performance comparison of low-budget 3D printers

机译:低预算3D打印机的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

Additive technologies have begun its development and application since the second half of the 1980s. The main reason behind that was to fulfil the market demands of increased product quality, flexibility, lower costs, shorter development time and production, as well as small series and individual production. As part of additive technologies, low-budget 3D printers have been developed and are widely available now, and they have enabled a significant expansion of the application of additive technologies for development and production. A large number of low-budget 3D printers on the market make it difficult for the potential investor to choose from. Therefore, potential investor in lowbudget 3D printers has to know more detailed their working principle, their construction, materials that they can process and the errors and problems of their technology that occur during processing. In the paper, two most popular low-budget 3D printers MakerBot Replicator 2X and Ultimaker Original was chosen for a detailed comparison. Two reference models were selected for detailed comparison of their performance. Evaluation was made based on final model properties such as deviations from nominal dimensions, shrinkage and surface roughness.
机译:自20世纪80年代下半年以来,添加剂技术已经开始发展和应用。其背后的主要原因是满足市场需求提高产品质量,灵活性,降低成本,较短的开发时间和生产,以及小系列和个体生产。作为添加剂技术的一部分,已经开发出低预算3D打印机,并且现在广泛使用,并且它们已经实现了应用添加技术应用于开发和生产的显着扩展。市场上大量的低预算3D打印机使潜在的投资者难以选择。因此,LowBudget 3D打印机中的潜在投资者必须更详细地了解他们的工作原理,它们的建筑材料,他们可以处理的材料以及在处理过程中发生的技术的错误和问题。在论文中,选择了两个最受欢迎的低预算3D打印机Makerbot Replicator 2x和Ultimaker原稿,详细比较。选择了两个参考模型以进行详细比较它们的性能。基于最终模型性质,例如与标称尺寸,收缩和表面粗糙度的偏差进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号