首页> 外文会议>Symposium on Computational Science >Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Highway Safety EEPDO
【24h】

Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Highway Safety EEPDO

机译:将机器学习算法应用于公路安全EEPDO

获取原文

摘要

Estimating expected equivalent property damage only (EEPDO) is crucial to highway crash hotspot identification (HSID), which is a key component of a highway safety improvement program. During the past 60 years, HSID methodologies advanced steadily from traditional scan based methods to statistical model based methods and have reached the sophistication of encompassing advanced statistical models with many variations and refinements while there still exist a number of theoretical issues unsolved. Consequently, these advanced models are not widely used in the practice of transportation engineering. This paper investigated the performance of an easy to use alternative to estimate the EEPDO -- using machine learning techniques of K nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm and compared it against the prevalent statistical model -- Negative Binomial (NB). NB assumes that the raw data follow a certain Gamma distribution which is not ubiquitously hold for crash data. Comparatively, being a nonparametric predictor, KNN is expected to produce better estimation on crash data in that it requires no assumption on the raw data. For experiment, a case study was conducted on highway US 49 in Harrison County of Mississippi. The results indicated that KNN outperformed NB.
机译:仅估计预期的等效性损坏(EEPDO)对于公路崩溃热点识别(HSID)至关重要,这是公路安全改进计划的关键组成部分。在过去的60年中,HSID方法从传统的基于扫描方法稳定地推进到基于统计模型的方法,并且已经达到了包含许多变化和改进的高级统计模型的复杂性,而仍然存在许多未解决的理论问题。因此,这些先进模型不广泛应用于运输工程的实践。本文调查了易于使用的替代方案来估算EEPDO - 使用K最近邻(KNN)算法的机器学习技术,并将其与普遍统计模型 - 负二项式(NB)进行比较。 NB假设原始数据遵循某种伽玛分布,这不是普遍存在的崩溃数据。相比之下,是非参数预测器,KNN预计将在崩溃数据中产生更好的估计,因为它不需要对原始数据的假设。对于实验,在密西西比州哈里森县的高速公路49上进行了一个案例研究。结果表明KNN优于NB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号