首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Agriculture and the Environment >Agronomic and Environmental Effects of Reducing P Fertilization for Four-Year Rice-Wheat Rotation Field Experiment in the Taihu Lake Region of Southern China
【24h】

Agronomic and Environmental Effects of Reducing P Fertilization for Four-Year Rice-Wheat Rotation Field Experiment in the Taihu Lake Region of Southern China

机译:中国南方太湖湖区四年稻麦旋转田间实验降低P施肥的农艺与环境影响

获取原文

摘要

The need for efficient use of phosphorus (P) in agriculture has been highlighted recently by concerns about the finite amount of P fertilizer resources (USGS, 2016). However, in the Taihu Lake Region (TLR) of China, farmers' injudicious and excessiveuse of P fertilizer has led to a dramatic spike in P accumulation in the lake (Figure 1) (Wang et al., 2012). To validate the feasibility of omitting phosphorus (P) fertilizer applications in the rice season for a rice-wheat rotation on a typical paddy soils in TLR, a four-year field experiment encompassing eight rice-wheat-growing seasons was conducted. Four different P regimes, including P fertilization only for wheat season (PW), P fertilization only for rice season (PR), P fertilization for both rice and wheat seasons (PR+W), and no P fertilization for either crop (Pzero) as a control (Figure 2, Table 1) were used as treatments. The results showed that compared to the PR+W treatment, the PW treatment had no significant difference in rice or wheat yields over the 4 years; but Olsen-P concentration in soil and total P contents in runoff declined by 10.5~36.7% and 12.0%, respectively (PO.05), and the utilization efficiency of P fertilizer increased by 3.54% (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Figure 4). According tothe current price of superphosphate, 3.06 billion RMB could be saved in TLR in just a single year. Therefore, the regime of omitting P fertilizer in rice for a rice-wheat rotation has positive effects on agriculture, environment and economy, and is feasible in the TLR. The results of field conditions were comparable to those from our previous soil pot laboratory experiments, and this was the first field test of omitting P fertilization of flooded rice in rice-wheat rotations.
机译:最近通过关于P肥料资源的有限量(USGS,2016)的担忧,最近突出了农业中磷(P)的有效使用的需要。然而,在中国的太湖地区(TLR),农民的肾脏化和过度使用的P肥料导致了湖中P积累的剧烈尖峰(图1)(Wang等,2012)。为了验证省略磷(P)施肥应用在水稻季节的可行性,在TLR中典型的水稻土壤循环旋转,进行了四年的田间实验,包括八个稻米生长季节。四种不同的P制度,包括P季节(PW)的P施肥,仅适用于大米季节(PR),对米饭和小麦季节的P施肥(PR + W),无需耕种(PZERO)作为对照(图2,表1)用作治疗方法。结果表明,与PR + W治疗相比,PW治疗在4年内没有显着差异或小麦产量;但水土中的Olsen-P浓度和径流的总P含量分别下降10.5〜36.7%和12.0%(PO.05),P肥料的利用效率增加了3.54%(P <0.05)(图3,图4)。根据目前的过磷酸盐价格,只需一年即可在TLR中保存30.6亿元人民币。因此,省略稻米循环中P肥的政权对农业,环境和经济产生了积极影响,并且在TLR中是可行的。现场条件的结果与我们以前的土壤盆实验室实验的结果相当,这是省略稻米旋转中淹水稻的P施肥的第一个现场试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号