首页> 外文会议>Australasian Weeds Conference >Strategic tillage impacts in long-term no-till
【24h】

Strategic tillage impacts in long-term no-till

机译:战略耕作影响在长期下降

获取原文

摘要

Continuous no-till (NT) has demonstrated tangible economic, environmental and soil health benefits aspects over conventional tillage (CT). However, adoption of NT has contributed to the build-up of herbicide-resistant weed populations, increased incidence of soil- and stubble-borne diseases, and stratification of nutrients and organic carbon near the soil surface. Some farmers resort to an occasional strategic tillage (ST) to manage constraints in NT systems. However, farmers who practice strict NT are concerned that even a single tillage operation may undo positive soil condition benefits accruing from NT farming systems. We selected five fields on long-term no-till (NT) managed soils (7—44 y) to represent typical conservation farming systems across north-eastern Australia. One-time tillage with either chisel tines or offset disc, or chain harrows in long-term NT helped control winter weeds. Grain yield overall showed no significant impact in both years; except in brown Sodosol (P = 0.06) in thefirst year. One-time tillage generally retained many of the soil health benefits of NT farming systems. However, tillage reduced soil moisture at most sites, but this decrease in soil moisture did not adversely affect productivity. This could be due to good rainfall received between tillage and seeding and subsequently during crop growth, which was able to replenish soil water lost from the seed zone for successful germination, seedling establishment and crop growth. These studies are allowing us to develop a conceptual framework for the potential impact of strategic tillage (ST) over time. Uptake of ST in long-term NT systems would depend on three aspects: system costs and profitability, soil health and environmental impact. For many Australian farmers, maintaining farm profitability is the priority and likely to dictate its adoption. However impacts on soil health and environment, especially the risk of erosion and the loss of soil carbon, will also influence a grower's choice to adopt ST.
机译:连续免耕(NT)已经证明切实的经济,环境和土壤的健康益处方面比传统的耕作(CT)。然而,采用NT的已到积聚除草剂抗性杂草种群的贡献,增加的土壤 - 和茬传疾病发生率,以及养分和土壤表面附近的有机碳的分层。一些农民求助于偶尔战略耕作(ST)来管理NT系统的约束。然而,农民谁厉行节约NT而言,即使是单一耕作操作可以撤销积极的土壤条件得益于NT的耕作制度累积。我们选择长期免耕(NT)管理土壤(7-44 Y)五个领域横跨东北澳大利亚代表了典型的保护性耕作系统。在长期NT凿子叉或偏移盘,或链耙一次性耕作有助于控制杂草的冬天。粮食产量总体呈现在这两年没有显著影响;在最早出现的年除了褐色Sodosol(P = 0.06)。一次性耕作通常保留了许多NT农业系统的土壤健康的好处。然而,在耕作大多数网站减少土壤水分,但这种降低土壤湿度并没有产生负面影响生产力。这可能是由于作物生长期间,耕作和播种,随后之间收到了良好的降雨,这是能够从种子区失去了成功的萌发,幼苗建立和作物生长及时补充土壤水分。这些研究使我们能够开发战略耕作(ST)随时间变化的潜在影响的概念框架。系统成本和盈利能力,土壤健康和环境的影响:ST的长期NT系统将取决于三个方面的摄取。对于许多澳大利亚的农民,农场保持盈利能力的优先级和可能决定采用它。然而对土壤的健康和环境,特别是侵蚀的风险,土壤碳流失的影响,也将影响种植者的选择采用ST。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号