首页> 外文会议>European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics Conference >'All that is solid melts into air': the Dutch debate about factory farming
【24h】

'All that is solid melts into air': the Dutch debate about factory farming

机译:'所有这些都是坚实的融化成空气':关于工厂农业的荷兰语辩论

获取原文

摘要

Over the last years the public debate in the Netherlands about the upscaling of livestock industry received national attention. Particularly in the Dutch region Noord-Brabant, in which most livestock is concentrated, a petition ('no more mega animal stables') had considerable success in putting the issue on the political agenda. It became an important topic in the campaign for provincial parliament elections and the province decided to limit the further growth of factory farms. These citizens argue that 'mega stables' pose a threat to the environment, animal welfare and health, and human welfare and health. However, advocates point to the economic necessity of further upscaling and see no other option. Looking more closely at the underlying visionsand ethical/social values of these contrary positions, different farm and food discourses can be identified. Models of capitalist and entrepreneurial farming seem to clash with social and ecological food visions. These different discourses also clarify that the societal resistance against the upscaling in livestock industry cannot be simply reduced to a conflict between economic and ecological values. The social conflict about 'mega stables' also points at the problem how agricultural modernization impacts on interhuman bonds. The role of rural identities and local ties should not be underestimated nor should the absence of protest of local dwellers during (regional) planned procedures concerning factory farming be too hastily interpreted as a solid basis of support. The debate on factory farming is also related with the problem of social cohesion in the countryside. The ethical debate about livestock industry should also acknowledge this social aspect that receives little attention compared to issuessuch as animal welfare, national health, the environment and biodiversity.
机译:在过去几年中,荷兰的公众辩论关于畜牧业的上升,得到了国家关注。特别是在荷兰地区Noord-Brabant,其中大多数牲畜集中,请愿书(“不再是Mega Animal Stables')在为政治议程上发出问题。它成为省议会选举活动中的一个重要议题,该省决定限制工厂农场的进一步增长。这些公民认为,“巨型马厩”对环境,动物福利和健康以及人类福利和健康构成了威胁。然而,倡导者指出进一步上升的经济需要,看不到其他选择。在潜在的视野和这些相反位置的道德/社会价值观上看起来更仔细地看起来,可以确定不同的农场和食物散文。资本主义和企业家农业的模式似乎与社会和生态粮食愿景发生冲突。这些不同的话语还澄清了对畜牧业的升高的社会抵抗不能简单地减少到经济和生态价值之间的冲突。关于'Mega Stables'的社会冲突还指出了农业现代化对interhuman债券的影响。不应低估农村身份和地方联系的作用,也不应该在有关工厂农业的计划程序期间没有抗议当地居民的抗议,这是过于匆匆地解释为坚实的支持基础。关于工厂农业的辩论也与农村社会凝聚力的问题有关。关于牲畜行业的道德辩论也应该承认这一社会方面,与Issuessuch作为动物福利,国家健康,环境和生物多样性相比,接受了很少的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号