首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom >The Aspect of Criminal Liability in Law Enforcement for the Prohibition on Hate Speech on Social Media
【24h】

The Aspect of Criminal Liability in Law Enforcement for the Prohibition on Hate Speech on Social Media

机译:禁止仇恨仇恨社交媒体执法的刑事责任方面

获取原文

摘要

The issue of hate speech may never have been predicted by scientists and social media creators because social media is in principle only intended to facilitate communication between people in various parts of the world. Since Indonesia is a state of law, we must always position the law as the commander, all social disputes should be resolved with a legal approach. Before the existence of Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, acts of public hate speech were carried out on the basis of the articles in Chapter V of the Criminal Code that regulates Crimes Against Public Order. Criminal Code and Article 28 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions is because the three articles are considered contrary to Article 28E paragraph (3) concerning freedom of expression because of the broad article formulation and crashing principles legal certainty so that it is feared can limit democracy. This paper discusses the issue of criminal liability for hate speech. The results of the study show that Article 157 of the Criminal Code and Article 28 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, they have some problems in the formulation, the most important aspect is the criminal liability aspect of these articles. This aspect of criminal responsibility becomes a hot area of debate over articles that contain a prohibition on the spread of hate speech because the matters regulated in the article have a too loose definition.
机译:仇恨言论的问题可能从来没有被科学家和社交媒体创造者预测,因为社交媒体是唯一的旨在促进人们在世界各地之间的通信原理。由于印尼是一个法治国家,我们必须始终法律定位为统帅,所有社会纠纷应该用法律途径来解决。 2008年第11号法关于信息和电子交易的存在之前,充当公共仇恨言论的V中的刑法章调节惩治违反公共秩序条款的基础上进行了。刑法和法律的第28条2008有关信息和电子交易的11号是因为三篇文章被认为是违背有关,因为广泛的物质制剂的言论自由和崩溃原则法律上的确定性,使其第28E款(3)担心会限制民主。本文讨论了仇恨言论的刑事责任问题。的研究结果表明,刑法第157条和法第28条第11号关于2008年信息和电子交易中,他们在制定一些问题的结果,最重要的方面是这些文章的刑事责任方面。刑事责任的这方面成为争论的一些包含仇恨言论的传播禁止,因为在文章中规定的事项有过于宽松定义文章的热点区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号