首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities >Understanding and Reflections on the Problem of the Representatives of the Supervisory Committee to the People's Congress
【24h】

Understanding and Reflections on the Problem of the Representatives of the Supervisory Committee to the People's Congress

机译:对人民代表大会主管委员会代表问题的理解和思考

获取原文

摘要

The promulgation of the Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China marks a new step in the reform of China's supervision system, but it also brings many new problems. This paper focuses on one of the issues: whether deputies to the NPC can be the object of supervision by the Supervisory Committee. There are two opinions on this issue in academia. Opponents hold that the Supervisory Committee is a state organ created by the National People's Congress to be responsible for the supervision of the National People's Congress. If it is allowed to supervise the deputies to the National People's Congress, it is obviously a violation of the principle of democratic centralism clearly stipulated in the Constitution of China and does not meet the requirements of the principle of self-discipline of the Parliament. Therefore Supporters argue that the supervision of NPC deputies by the Supervisory Committee is in line with the legislative spirit and provisions of the Supervisory Law. Whether the supervision of NPC deputies by the Supervisory Committee will affect the exercise of the functions of the power organs of our country belongs to the limitation of the supervisory power of the Supervisory Committee and should not be included in the discussion of the supervisory objects of the Supervisory Committee. This paper gives a brief introduction to both views, but tends to support the views of the critics.
机译:中华人民共和国监督法的颁布标志着中国监督制度改革的新一步,但它也带来了许多新问题。本文重点介绍了其中一个问题:无论是NPC的代表是否可以是监事会监督的对象。在学术界有两项问题有两种意见。对手认为,监事会是国家人民代表大会创建的国家机关,负责国家人民代表大会的监督。如果允许向国家人民代表大会监督代表,显然违反了中国宪法中明确规定的民主集中制的原则,并不符合议会自律原则的要求。因此支持者认为,人大代表,监事会的监督与立法精神和监督法的规定。无论是人大代表,监事会的监督会影响我国的权力机关的职能的行使属于监事会监督权的限制,不应该被列入的监督对象的讨论监事会。本文简要介绍了这两个意见,但往往支持批评者的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号