首页> 外文会议>Workshop on modular adaptable ships >Modular Adaptable Ship Technologies and Design Methods
【24h】

Modular Adaptable Ship Technologies and Design Methods

机译:模块化适应船舶技术和设计方法

获取原文

摘要

1. The life of a Naval ship is now supposed to be 45 years, τ_(HULL) = 45 2. Everything on it has a smaller life cycle, τ_(CS) < 45, τ_(HME) < 45, τ_(C5I) 45 3. The threats develop in shorter time frames, τ_(THREAT>< 45 4. My hypothesis is that this scenario will get worse, especially τ_(THREAT) 5. In response to potential or real threats, as well as capabilities, we change missions a. BMD, IAMD, Cyber, Autonomy, and others not yet envisioned... 6. If we can't resolve this, we lose, either through irrelevance or cost 7. So, how do we resolve this? How do we maintain Value Robustness through the service life? 8. Desired properties of systems that manifest after the system is in use. a. Not the primary functional requirement b. Typically concern wider system impacts that manifest and may not necessarily be designed-in explicitly a) Execution qualities that are observable during operations b) Evolution qualities that are underlying in the architecture c. Intangible d. Often, but not always, end in "ility" e. There's about 60 of them listed on Wikipedia a) And yet I can go list some off the top of my head not there A. Affordabilllty, survivability, vulnerability, capability...
机译:1.海军船的生命现在应该是45年,τ_(船体)= 45 2.它的一切都有一个较小的生命周期,τ_(cs)<45,τ_(hme)<45,τ___________(c5i ) 45 3.威胁在较短的时间范围内发展,τ_(威胁> <45 4.我的假设是这种情况会变得更糟,特别是τ_(威胁)5。响应潜在或真正的威胁,以及能力,我们改变任务一个。BMD,IAMD,网络,自主权等人还没有设想... 6.如果我们无法解决这一点,我们将通过无关紧要或成本7.因此,我们如何解决这个问题?我们如何通过使用寿命来维持价值鲁棒性?8.系统使用后明显的系统的所需属性。一个。不是主要功能要求b。通常涉及更广泛的系统影响,表明,可能不一定是设计 - 在明确A)在运营期间可观察到的执行质量b)在架构中的潜在的演变质量。无形的d。通常,但并不总是,以“istily”结束。其中大约60个在维基百科上市A))然而,我可以在我的头顶上列出一些,而不是A.提供了Affordabilllty,生存能力,漏洞,能力......

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号