首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Photonics in Dermatology and Plastic Surgery >Assessing the predictive capability of optical imaging techniques, Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) and Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI), to the gold standard of clinical assessment in a controlled animal model
【24h】

Assessing the predictive capability of optical imaging techniques, Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) and Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI), to the gold standard of clinical assessment in a controlled animal model

机译:评估光学成像技术,空间域成像(SFDI)和激光散斑成像(LSI)的预测能力,对受控动物模型中的临床评估的金标准

获取原文

摘要

The current standard for assessment of burn severity and subsequent wound healing is through clinical examination, which is highly subjective. Accurate early assessment of burn severity is critical for dictating the course of wound management. Complicating matters is the fact that burn wounds are often large and can have multiple regions that vary in severity. In order to manage the treatment more effectively, a tool that can provide spatially resolved information related to mapping burn severity could aid clinicians when making decisions. Several new technologies focus on burn care in an attempt to help clinicians objectively determine burn severity. By quantifying perfusion, laser speckle imaging (LSI) has had success in categorizing burn wound severity at earlier time points than clinical assessment alone. Additionally, spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is a new technique that can quantify the tissue structural damage associated with burns to achieve earlier categorization of burn severity. Here we compared the performance of a commercial LSI device (PeriCam PSI, Perimed Inc.), a SFDI device (Reflect RS?, Modulated Imaging Inc.) and conventional clinical assessment in a controlled (porcine) model of graded burn wound severity over the course of 28 days. Specifically we focused on the ability of each system to predict the spatial heterogeneity of the healed wound at 28 days, based on the images at an early time point. Spatial heterogeneity was defined by clinical assessment of distinct regions of healing on day 28. Across six pigs, 96 burn wounds (3 cm diameter) were created. Clinical assessment at day 28 indicated that 39 had appeared to heal in a heterogeneous manner. Clinical observation at day 1 found 35/ 39 (90%) to be spatially heterogeneous in terms of burn severity. The LSI system was able to detect spatial heterogeneity of burn severity in 14/ 39 (36%) cases on day 1 and 23/ 39 cases (59%) on day 7. By contrast the SFDI system was able to detect spa
机译:评估烧伤严重程度和随后的伤口愈合的当前标准是通过临床检查,这是高度主观的。准确的早期评估烧伤严重程度对于指示伤口管理课程至关重要。复杂的事项是烧伤伤口通常很大,并且可以有多个因严重程度而变化的区域。为了更有效地管理治疗,可以提供与映射烧伤严重程度相关的空间解决信息的工具可以在做出决策时帮助临床医生。几种新技术专注于燃烧护理,以帮助临床医生客观地确定烧伤严重程度。通过量化灌注,激光散斑成像(LSI)在比单独的临床评估的时间点分类为烧伤伤口严重程度。此外,空间频域成像(SFDI)是一种新技术,可以量化与烧伤相关的组织结构损坏,以实现烧伤严重程度的早期分类。在这里,我们将商业LSI设备(PERICAM PSI,PERIMED Inc.)的性能进行了比较,SFDI设备(反映RS?,调制的成像Inc.)和常规临床评估在受控(猪)模型的分级烧伤严重程度上课程为28天。具体地,我们专注于每种系统在早期时间点的图像中预测28天的愈合伤口的空间异质性的能力。空间异质性通过在第28天的临床评估中定义了不同区域的临床评估。遍布六只猪,产生96颗烧伤(直径3厘米)。第28天的临床评估表明39似乎以异质的方式愈合。第1天的临床观察发现35/39(90%)在烧伤严重程度方面是空间异质的。 LSI系统能够在第1天和第23天(36%)(36%)病例(第23天)检测烧伤严重程度的空间异质性(36%)(59%)。通过对比,SFDI系统能够检测到水疗中心

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号