首页> 外文会议>SPE Norway One Day Seminar >MWD Wellbore Surveying – Sensitivity Analysis of Survey Errors as a Function of Hole Inclination and Compass Direction
【24h】

MWD Wellbore Surveying – Sensitivity Analysis of Survey Errors as a Function of Hole Inclination and Compass Direction

机译:MWD井筒测量 - 调查误差的敏感性分析作为孔倾斜和指南针方向的函数

获取原文

摘要

Measurement While Drilling (MWD) is a common survey tool used in wellbore positioning. The industry often uses the Industry Steering Committee on Wellbore Survey Accuracy (ISCWSA) error models for estimating the Wellbore Position Uncertainty (WPU). However, the model's sensitivity to direction and nature of trajectory has not been discussed in detail. In this paper, a software model has been developed to better understand the influence of the individual error sources on measurement and position uncertainty in various drilling directions and hole sections. Most operators have classified accurate wellbore positioning and directional design as one of the pillars of safety. It is commonly known that measurement accuracy of frequently used MWD instruments decreases with increasing hole inclination. Survey accuracy is also influenced by North to East direction. This work provides a detailed understanding of the behavior and contribution of each survey error source and screens the error terms contributing most towards WPU. Visualizing the contribution of each error source as a function of well path direction and inclination will support the understanding of position uncertainty of individual wells. The results in this paper are based on analysis of the ISCWSA Non-mag error model. It has been observed that some errors are most dominant in the North/South drilling direction while others are most dominant in the East/West direction. Similarly, some error sources are most effective in the vertical hole section and least effective in the build-up or horizontal sections. This process continues for all different error sources in various hole sections and drilling directions. Therefore, this paper has summarized the most important error sources for the vertical, build-up and horizontal sections of the three wells, i.e North/South (NS), North/East (NE) & East/West (EW). The visualization of error sources will provide a more focused approach towards ultimately reducing the WPU. The work in this paper is a part of a new digital well planning and well construction software tool. The working title of this software is Life Cycle Well Integrity Model – LCWIM.
机译:钻孔(MWD)的测量是井筒定位中使用的常用调查工具。该行业常常使用井眼调查准确性(ISCWSA)的行业指导委员会来估算井口位置不确定性(WPU)。然而,该模型对轨迹的方向和性质的敏感性尚未详细讨论。在本文中,已经开发了一种软件模型,以更好地了解各个误差源对各种钻孔方向和孔部分的测量和位置不确定性的影响。大多数运营商将准确的井筒定位和方向设计分类为安全的一个支柱。通常已知经常使用的MWD仪器的测量精度随着空穴倾斜度的增加而降低。调查准确性也受到北向东方向的影响。这项工作详细了解每个调查错误源的行为和贡献,并筛选最符合WPU的错误术语。作为井路方向的函数和倾斜度的函数可视化每个错误源的贡献将支持对各个井的位置不确定性的理解。本文的结果基于ISCWSA非MAG错误模型的分析。已经观察到,北/南钻方向的一些错误是最占主导地位的,而其他误差在东/西方向上最占主导地位。类似地,一些误差源在垂直孔部分中最有效,并且在构建或水平部分中最少有效。在各种孔部分和钻井方向上继续所有不同误差源的过程继续。因此,本文总结了三个井的垂直,积聚和水平部分的最重要的误差来源,即北/南(NS),北/东(NE)和东/西(EW)。错误源的可视化将提供更加集中的方法,最终还原WPU。本文的工作是新的数字井规划和良好的施工软件工具的一部分。该软件的工作标题是生命周期完整性模型 - LCWIM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号