首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition >Technology of Fire Flooding Process Control: Application to Fire Flooding in a Deep and Thick Heavy Oil Reservoir in China
【24h】

Technology of Fire Flooding Process Control: Application to Fire Flooding in a Deep and Thick Heavy Oil Reservoir in China

机译:防火过程控制技术:中国深层厚重石油水库火灾洪水的应用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Fire flooding process has been applied to the thick and deep heavy oil reservoirs G3618 and G3 in Liaohe oil field in China. Currently,there are two main operating issues: the serious combustion front gravity override,and the low areal sweep efficiency. Thus,research of process control is conducted for the entire project area,each layer,and also individual well patterns,with the objective of achieving better vertical and areal conformance. G3 and G3618 have average thickness of 68.6m and 103.8m,with similar depth of 1600m. Three major process control methods are used: using vertical-horizontal well configuration,reconfiguring to line drive plus vertical-horizontal hybrid configuration,and air injecting at top positions. We establish geological model with focus on interlayer vertical communications. Through reservoir simulation and field data analysis,we test potential benefits of using horizontal producers. We further compare the different performances of line drive and pattern flood in G3618 and G3. Finally,with G3618 having 20 degree dip angle,we test the effect of air injection at higher elevations through simulations and laboratory experiments. First,we have found 2m as the critical thickness for shale interlayer barriers to prevent vertical communications and to minimize gravity override. The combination of vertical and horizontal wells shows great improvements in conformance,since the horizontal producer at bottom of the reservoir could more effectively drain the reservoir. Second,we find line drive is more effective than pattern flood with recovery improvement of around 10%,proven by reservoir simulations and field production analysis. Third,if we inject from top,we benefit from high recovery of gravity drainage,with much oil accumulated at reservoir bottom. We recommend conducting top injection when reservoir thickness is above the critical value of 20m. Finally,we have establish line drive fire flooding configuration in G3 reservoir with air injectors located at top positions of the reservoir,which causes oil production rate to increase by about 80% since initiating these adjustments. For G3618 reservoir,we have also reconfigured the well patterns to line drive with air injectors at elevated locations,with daily production rate increased by 30%. Through field experience,we have found that controlling combustion front override and improving areal sweep efficiency are great technical challenges for fire flooding process. We demonstrate that measures of implementing line drive,injecting at the top while producing at deeper locations,and configuration of vertical injectors and horizontal producers have already made significant improvements in fire flooding production performance in Liaohe oil field in China.
机译:中国辽河油田的厚厚和深沉重油藏G3618和G3应用了防火过程。目前,有两个主要的运营问题:严重的燃烧前重力覆盖,并且低的面扫效率。因此,对整个项目区域,每层和单个井图案进行过程控制的研究,其目的是实现更好的垂直和面积符合。 G3和G3618平均厚度为68.6米,103.8米,深度为1600米。使用了三种主要过程控制方法:使用垂直水平井配置,重新配置到线驱动加垂直水平混合配置,以及在顶部位置的空气注入。我们建立了重点在于层间垂直通信的地质模型。通过水库仿真和现场数据分析,我们测试使用水平生产商的潜在好处。我们进一步比较了G3618和G3中的线路驱动和模式泛滥的不同性能。最后,通过具有20度倾角的G3618,通过模拟和实验室实验,测试空气喷射在较高升高处的效果。首先,我们发现了2米作为页岩中间屏障的临界厚度,以防止垂直通信,并最大限度地减少重力覆盖。垂直和水平井的组合显示了一致性的巨大改进,因为储层底部的水平生产者可以更有效地排出储存器。其次,我们发现线条驱动比具有恢复改善约10%的模式洪水更有效,通过储层模拟和现场生产分析证明。第三,如果我们从顶部注射,我们会受益于重力排水的高回收,储存器底部具有大量的油。我们建议在储层厚度高于20m的临界值时进行顶部注射。最后,我们在G3水库中建立了线路驱动防火配置,空气注射器位于储存器的顶部位置,由于启动这些调整,从而导致油生产率增加约80%。对于G3618水库,我们还重新配置了在高架地点的空气喷射器线路驱动器的井模式,日本生产率增加了30%。通过现场经验,我们发现控制燃烧前覆盖和提高的区域扫描效率是防火过程的巨大技术挑战。我们证明了在辽河油田的垂直喷射器和水平生产商处产生的措施,在顶部实施线路驱动,在顶部注入顶部,以及垂直喷射器和水平生产者的配置已经取得了显着的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号