首页> 外文会议>SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control >Qualification and Implementation of a Technologically and Cost Effective Solution for Perforating in Drilling Fluid for HPHT Fields: Gudrun Case History
【24h】

Qualification and Implementation of a Technologically and Cost Effective Solution for Perforating in Drilling Fluid for HPHT Fields: Gudrun Case History

机译:用于HPHT领域的钻井液中穿孔技术和经济效益解决方案的资格和实施:Gudrun案例

获取原文

摘要

With increasing focus on identifying cost effective solutions to well design with minimal impact on productivity, this paper will focus on an alternative to cesium formate as perforation fluid in the HPHT Gudrun field operated by Statoil. Cesium formate has been used with success for drilling and perforating many HPHT wells. However, given the significant cost of this fluid coupled with low oil prices, Statoil wanted to perform testing to assess the performance of an alternative low ECD oil based mud as a perforation fluid. The paper will describe the extensive qualification testing that has been performed. This includes coreflooding using representative plugs from Gudrun under downwhole temperature and pressure conditions. In addition, eight Section IV perforation tests have been performed to compare the performance of Cs formate and the low ECD oil based mud. These tests were undertaken using gas and oil saturated cores to reflect different production scenarios. The main aspects of the perforation operation that were reflected in the test design were as follows. 1. Perforating at reservoir pressure and laboratory testing temperature of approximately 100°C 2. Simulating an extended shut in period after perforation 3. Undertaking a clean up sequence using scaled down flowrates Based on the results of the coreflooding combined with the section IV 19B testing, the low ECD OBM was selected as the perforating fluid for use on Gudrun. The perceived benefits of using the low ECD OBM were as follows. 1. Simplification: use of the same fluid for drilling and perforating the reservoir section. 2.Tangible cost savings in fluid cost and time savings of approximately 40M NOK ($5M). 3. Potentially increased productivity compared to cesium formate. 4. Improved standardization of the operational sequence. Perforation modelling is described and comparison is made between this and the Section IV tests. Finally, the well start-up experiences and production data are presented demonstrating the effectiveness of the low ECD oil based mud as a perforation fluid.
机译:随着越来越重点识别成本有效的解决方案,通过对生产力的影响最小的影响,本文将重点关注由attatoil运营的HPHT Gudrun领域的穿孔液作为穿孔液的替代品。铯甲酸甲酸铯已经成功用于钻孔和穿孔许多HPHT井。然而,鉴于这种流体的大量成本与低油价相连,汀类公司希望进行测试,以评估替代低ECD油基泥浆作为穿孔液的性能。本文将描述已执行的广泛资格测试。这包括在下落温度和压力条件下使用来自Gudrun的代表性插头的内心全面。此外,已经进行了八个截面穿孔试验以比较CS格式的性能和低ECD油油的泥浆。这些测试采用气体和油饱和核来进行,以反映不同的生产情景。在测试设计中反映的穿孔操作的主要方面如下。 1.在储层压力和实验室测试温度下穿孔约100°C 2.穿孔后模拟延长的关闭。使用基于CoreFlood的结果与第IV部分19B测试结合的结果进行了清洁序列,低ECD OBM被选为用于Gudrun的穿孔液。使用低ECD OBM的感知益处如下。 1.简化:使用相同的流体用于钻孔和穿孔储存器部分。 2.不明显的成本节约在液体成本和时间节省约40米(500万美元)。 3.与铯甲酸铯相比,潜在的生产率增加。 4.改进了操作序列的标准化。描述了穿孔建模,并在第IV节测试之间进行比较。最后,提出了良好的启动经验和生产数据,证明了低ECD油基泥作为穿孔液的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号