首页> 外文会议>SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference >Evaluation of an Amphoteric Surfactant for CO2 Foam Applications:AComparative Study
【24h】

Evaluation of an Amphoteric Surfactant for CO2 Foam Applications:AComparative Study

机译:二氧化碳泡沫应用的两性表面活性剂评价:比较研究

获取原文

摘要

In a surfactant-alternating-gas(SAG)injection,stable foams form viscous barriers and divert fluids,thereby providing conformance for enhanced oil recovery(EOR).Once foam decays,injected gas resumespreferential flow through thief zones,demonstrating the need for higher foam stability.Thus,longer foamhalf-lives or stability is one of the key factors determining the success of any foam-field application.Theability of surfactants to stabilize foam depends on the gas type.Many surfactants that form stable foam withnitrogen(N2)and hydrocarbon gas are not able to form a stable foam with carbon dioxide(CO2),whichcould be due to the presence of low pH environment in CO2 floods,relatively high solubility of CO2 in water,and CO2 permeability through liquid films.To improve the performance of CO2 floods,it is imperative toidentify surfactants that can enhance the stability of CO2-foam.This work investigates an amphoteric surfactant,which is commercially available and priced similarlyto other commonly used EOR foamers,for its ability to stabilize CO2-foam.Static stability and dynamiccoreflood tests were conducted at high pressure and high temperature conditions,where CO2 remained in thesupercritical state.The performance of the amphoteric surfactant was compared with another good foameron the basis of foam stability and strength,both in bulk and in porous media.Dynamic adsorption testswere conducted to compare the adsorption of amphoteric and anionic surfactants on both sandstone andcarbonate rock surfaces.Ways to mitigate surfactant adsorption on rock surfaces were studied.In terms of CO2-foam stability,the amphoteric surfactant performed much better than the anionic andnonionic surfactants evaluated in this study.In the presence of oil,foam stabilized by the amphotericsurfactant exhibited the longest half-life in static tests.However,the amphoteric surfactant performedsimilarly to other surfactants with nitrogen or hydrocarbon gas.Compared to other surfactants,foamstabilized by the amphoteric surfactant remained stable and exhibited higher apparent viscosity at high foamqualities.Foam stability at higher qualities improves the performance of SAG process as it can lengthen thegas cycle and reduce the amount of surfactant needed,a beneficial outcome when water supply is limited.We found the adsorption of amphoteric on carbonate rock to be much lower than on sandstone rock.Compared to ionic and nonionic surfactants,amphoteric surfactants are usually avoided for oilfieldapplications due to potential for high retention.Based on systematic evaluation,our work demonstrates theunique ability of amphoteric surfactants to enhance the stability of CO2-foams at reservoir conditions.
机译:在表面活性剂 - 交替气体(SAG)注射中,稳定的泡沫形成粘性屏障和转移液体,从而提供了增强的采油(EOR)的一致性.CE泡沫衰变,通过小偷区域注入气体恢复精化流动,展示了更高泡沫的需要稳定性,较长的泡沫寿命或稳定性是确定任何泡沫场应用成功的关键因素之一。表面活性剂稳定泡沫的可率取决于稳定泡沫含有稳定泡沫(N2)和烃的燃气型表面活性剂。气体不能形成具有二氧化碳(CO2)的稳定泡沫,因此由于CO 2洪水中的低pH环境,水中的溶解度相对较高,CO 2通过液体薄膜的渗透性而导致的稳定泡沫。以提高性能二氧化碳洪水,令人遗症取决于可以提高CO2-FOAM的稳定性的表面活性剂。该工作调查了两性表面活性剂,其可商购和类似地定价的其他通道Nly使用EOR泡沫塑料,其能够稳定CO 2 - 泡沫的能力。在高压和高温条件下进行稳定性和动脉动力学测试,其中CO 2保持在术术状态。与另一个好的泡沫源相比,两性表面活性剂的性能与另一个好的泡沫相比泡沫稳定性和强度,散装和多孔介质中的强度。进行动力吸附试验,以比较两性和阴离子表面活性剂在砂岩碳酸氢盐岩表面上的吸附。在研究岩石表面上减轻表面活性剂吸附。在二氧化碳方面泡沫稳定性,两性表面活性剂比本研究评价的阴离子和数学表面活性剂更好。在油的存在下,由AmPhotericSuriftant稳定的泡沫表现出静态试验中最长的半衰期。然而,两性表面活性剂与其他表面活性剂一起刺激相似氮气或烃类气体。对其他表面活性剂,泡沫化的b Y型两性表面活性剂保持稳定,在高泡沫状度下表现出更高的表观粘度。较高品质的稳定性提高了SAG工艺的性能,因为它可以延长循环并减少所需的表面活性剂,当供水时有益的结果。我们发现两性在碳酸盐岩上的吸附远低于砂岩Rock.com对离子和非离子表面活性剂的,通常避免两性表面活性剂由于高保留的潜力而避免了油田申请。基于系统评价,我们的工作表明了两性的恒定能力表面活性剂以增强储层条件下CO2泡沫的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号