首页> 外文会议>SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference >Joint Optimization of Well Completions and Controls for CO2 Enhanced OilRecovery and Storage
【24h】

Joint Optimization of Well Completions and Controls for CO2 Enhanced OilRecovery and Storage

机译:CO2增强油脂衰退和储存的井井井完井和控制的联合优化

获取原文

摘要

CO2 storage through CO2 enhanced oil recovery(EOR)is considered as one of the technologies to helppromote larger scale deployment of CO2 storage because of associated economic benefits through oilrecovery,45Q tax credits and the utilization of existing infrastructure.The objective of this study is todemonstrate how optimal reservoir management and operation strategies(including well completions andcontrols)can be used to optimize both CO2 storage and oil recovery.The optimization problem was focused on jointly estimating the well completions(i.e.,fraction ofinjection/production well perforations in each reservoir layer)and CO2 injection/oil production controlsthat maximize the net present value(NPV)in a CO2 EOR and storage operation.We utilized the newlydeveloped StoSAG algorithm,one of the most efficient optimization algorithms in the reservoir managementcommunity,to solve the optimization problem.The performance of joint optimization approach wascompared with the performance of well control only optimization approach.In addition,the performanceof co-optimization of CO2 storage and oil recovery approach was compared with the performances ofmaximization of only CO2 storage and maximization of only oil recovery approaches.The optimization results showed that a joint optimization of well completions and well controls canachieve an 8.84% higher final NPV than the one obtained from the optimization of only well controls.Itwas observed that the NPV incremental for joint optimization is mainly due to the fact that the optimalwell completions and controls approach results in efficient CO2 storage and oil production from differentreservoir layers depending on the differences in individual layer properties.Comparison of co-optimization(i.e.,maximization of NPV)and maximization of only CO2 storage or only oil recovery showed that theco-optimization and maximization of only oil recovery result in significantly higher final NPV than thatobtained through maximization of only CO2 storage approach while maximization of only CO2 storage canachieve significantly higher CO2 storage in the reservoir compared to the other two scenarios.The similarresults for co-optimization and maximization of oil production are obtained because of the difference in oilrevenue compared to CO2 storage tax credit.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first study in oil/gas industry and CO2 storage community toperform joint optimization of well completions and well controls in the fields.We expect that the proposedoptimization framework will be a useful and efficient tool for field engineers to optimally manage CO2EOR projects to maximize revenue through oil recovery as well as CO2 storage by taking advantage of thenew 45Q tax law.
机译:CO2储存通过CO2增强的石油回收(EOR)被认为是帮助突破大规模部署二氧化碳储存的技术之一,因为通过油脂过渡,45季度税收抵免和现有基础设施的利用。本研究的目的是令人沮丧如何使用最佳的水库管理和运营策略(包括井完井和控制)来优化二氧化碳储存和石油回收。优化问题集中在共同估计井完井(即每个储层层中的分数/生产井穿孔)和二氧化碳注射/石油生产控制器在CO2 EOR和储存操作中最大化净现值(NPV)。我们利用了新型的STOSAG算法,储层管理中最有效的优化算法之一,解决了优化问题。性能联合优化方法与井的性能相比仅控制优化方法。此外,CO2储存和石油回收方法的共同优化的表演与仅仅二氧化碳储存的表现和仅利的石油回收方法的最大化的性能进行了比较。优化结果表明,井完井的联合优化良好的控制能力高于最终NPV的8.84%,而不是从井控制的优化中获得的。itwas观察到联合优化的NPV增量主要是由于最佳完成和控制方法的效果有效的CO2储存和油根据不同的资源层生产,取决于单层属性的差异..得到的协同优化(即,NPV的最大化)和仅仅二氧化碳储存的最大化或仅溢油的最大化表明,只有储存和最大化的储存结果显着更高最终NPV通过仅通过仅限二氧化碳的最大化存储方法,同时只有二氧化碳储存的最大化,与其他两种情况相比,储库中的CO2存储明显高于CO2储存。与二氧化碳储税相比,石油产量的共同优化和最大化的SIMILARRESELLS获得的我们所知的最佳知识,这是石油/天然气行业的第一次研究,以及CO2存储社区倾斜的联合优化井完井和良好的控制领域。我们期望拟议优化框架将是用于现场工程师的有用而有效的工具最佳管理CO2EOR项目,通过利用当时的45季度税法来最大限度地通过石油恢复以及二氧化碳储存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号