【24h】

How Do You Know If You’re Learning from Incidents?

机译:你怎么知道你是否从事学习?

获取原文

摘要

Objectives/Scope: Despite the importance of learning from incidents, little is known about the indicators that signal whether people have actually learnt. Previous research has shown that learning is dependent on context; a software engineer and an operator at a petrochemical plant display learning in different ways, so the indicators of whether or not they have learnt will differ. Therefore it is important that energy organisations are able to recognise indicators of learning following an incident that are relevant to their context. The objective of this study is to explore ways of understanding whether individuals are learning from incidents, and provide a general model that companies can use as a starting point in evaluating learning. Methods, procedure, process: The Open University, in collaboration with the Energy Institute, undertook interviews with 18 workers at a European site of a multinational energy company. The participants came from a variety of positions in both operations and maintenance, ranging from front-end operators to managers. A model of professional learning was used to guide a thematic analysis of what participants viewed as effective learning from incidents. Results, observations, conclusions: The interviews provided many examples of ways that individual practice and site processes had changed as a result of learning from incidents. Indicators of learning ranged from individual traits, such as accurate perception of risks, to changes in leadership priorities. While the number of incidents has been used in both research and practice as an indicator of learning, the interviews demonstrated that there are many ways in which learning can be evidenced. Understanding what changes are important for individuals, teams, leadership, and the company as a whole is a first step to being able to assess if effective learning is taking place. Our preliminary findings indicate that there is no single measure that can be used to assess how well people learn. However, once a company has defined what changes it expects to see, a combination of measures could be created to give insight into how effectively learning is happening. Novel/additive information: This paper aims to provide some examples of indicators of learning after an incident. Both in research and in practice a single metric is often used to assess whether learning is occurring. This study proposes a model that would allow companies to select appropriate metrics for various aspects of learning from incidents.
机译:目标/范围:尽管从事件中学习的重要性,但对信号的指标知之甚少,这些指标是人们实际学习的。以前的研究表明,学习取决于背景;一种软件工程师和在石化植物展示学习的操作员以不同方式学习,因此他们是否学到的指标会有所不同。因此,重要的是,能源组织能够在与其背景相关的事件后识别学习的指标。本研究的目的是探讨理解个人是否正在侵入事件的方式,并提供公司可以作为评估学习的起点的一般模型。方法,程序,过程:开放大学与能源研究所合作,在欧洲跨国能源公司的欧洲工厂进行了访谈。参与者来自经营和维护的各种职位,从前端运营商到管理人员。专业学习型号用于指导对从事故中视为有效学习的参与者的主题分析。结果,观察结论:访谈提供了许多各种方式的示例,即各个实践和现场进程因从事故中学而改变。学习指标范围从个别特征等等,例如对风险的准确看法,对领导优先事项的变化。虽然在研究和实践中使用的事件数量是学习指标,但面试表明有很多方法可以证明学习。了解全部更改对个人,团队,领导以及整个公司的重要性是能够评估有效学习的第一步。我们的初步调查结果表明,没有单一的措施可用于评估人们的学习程度。但是,一旦公司确定了它预期的改变,可以创建措施的组合,以了解如何有效地发生。小说/添加剂信息:本文旨在在事件发生后提供一些学习指标的例子。在研究和实践中,单一度量通常用于评估是否正在发生学习。本研究提出了一种模型,允许公司为从事故中学习的各个方面选择适当的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号