【24h】

Towards Standardising SHPB Testing - A Round Robin Exercise

机译:朝着标准化SHPB测试 - 循环练习

获取原文

摘要

The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test, while widely utilised for high strain rate tests, has yet to be standardised. As an exploratory step towards developing a standard test method or protocol, a Round Robin test series has been conducted between four institutions: (i) Swinburne University of Technology, Australia (ii) University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, (iii) University of Cape Town, South African and (iv) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Each institution prepared specimens from a metallic material, and provided batches of specimens from their chosen material to the other institutions. The materials utilised in this round of testing were commercially pure copper and aluminium, magnesium alloy and stainless steel (316 grade). The intent of the first exercise is to establish the consistency of SHPB test results on nominally identical specimens at comparable elevated strain rates, conducted by different laboratories following notionally similar test procedures with some freedom in data processing. This paper presents and compares the results of the first batch of tests for copper, identifying variations between results from different laboratories. The variation between different laboratories' results for copper is suffciently small that there is confidence in the potential to develop a draft standard in future.
机译:拆分霍普金森压力棒(SHPB)试验,同时广泛用于高应变速率测试,尚未标准化。作为开发标准测试方法或协议的探索性步骤,在四个机构之间进行了一系列循环赛测试系列:(i)澳大利亚澳大利亚(II)大学圣保罗大学(iii)开普省大学镇,南非和(四)新加坡南阳科技大学。每个机构从金属材料中准备了标本,并从他们所选材料中提供了批次的标本。在本轮测试中使用的材料是商业上纯铜和铝,镁合金和不锈钢(316级)。第一次练习的目的是建立SHPB测试结果对具有不同实验室的标称相同标本的SHPB测试结果的一致性,在象征类似的测试程序之后,在数据处理中具有一些自由度。本文介绍并比较了铜的第一批测试的结果,识别不同实验室结果之间的变化。不同实验室对铜的结果之间的变化很少小,因为有可能在将来开发标准草案的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号