首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Ethics in Governance >REPRESENTING POWER: Muhammadiyah in the 2014 DPD's Election in Yogyakarta Special Regions, Indonesia
【24h】

REPRESENTING POWER: Muhammadiyah in the 2014 DPD's Election in Yogyakarta Special Regions, Indonesia

机译:代表权力:Muhammadiyah在2014年DPD在Yogyakarta特殊地区选举,印度尼西亚

获取原文

摘要

After the big bang of democratization, Indonesia has been employing a dramatic decentralization practice in Indonesia nationwide. Since 1999, Indonesia has been electing for representative council (DPR RI) and regional representation so called DPD RI in very direct way. This paper aims to analyse the DPD's election in Yogyakarta special region of Indonesia in the competition process among the different group interests which are Islamic group (Muhammadiyah, NU, PKS), Kraton/aristocrat interest, and nationalist group interest (PDI-P). Those groups are the big four that have been playing important role in the competition in DPD election sequentially in 2004, 2009, and 2014. In Yogyakarta special region, four member of DPD since the first election has been represented by three Islamic group both modern and traditional ones and by Yogyakarta palace. this paper more focus on the 2014 election which were followed by more competitor from Pakualaman palace, and also from nationalist group that have same mass with the Palace, this competition was really interesting to explain, how people decide their representative members and how different group compete each other in this election. Also, what strategy and by manner they collect voters in this individual based-individual candidate election. From the field research, It can be concluded at least there are three point (1) each candidate was strongly endorsed by established organization and community to support for the election since 2004. So, four incumbent easy won the competition; (2) the success team have many thing in common for example the focus on the core of supporter (basis masa) by using strategy 'by name by address list"; and lastly (3) they were employing any symbolic that really easy to understand for the common people such as Islamic value, organization value, ideology, etc. by adopting many social activity and ritual in promoting candidates for example club goods, voluntary organization, and other forms of informal communities.
机译:在民主化的大爆炸后,印度尼西亚一直在全国印度尼西亚采用戏剧性的权力下放实践。自1999年以来,印度尼西亚一直在选中代表委员会(DPR RI)和区域代表团,以非常直接的方式称为DPD RI。本文旨在分析竞争过程中印度尼西亚日惹特区的DPD选举,这是伊斯兰群体(穆罕默迪亚,Nu,PKS),克朗森/贵族兴趣和民族主义群体兴趣(PDI-P)。这些群体是在2004年,2009年,2014年在2004年,2009年和2014年在DPD选举中竞争中发挥着重要作用的重要作用。在日惹特殊地区,自第一次选举以来的四名DPD成员是由三个伊斯兰集团的现代和传统的和日惹宫。本文更加注重2014年选举,随后是巴伐拉曼宫的更多竞争对手,也来自与宫殿有同样群众的民族主义团体,这场比赛是为了解释,人们如何决定他们的代表成员以及不同的群体如何竞争在这次选举中彼此。此外,他们在这种基于个人候选人选举中收集选民的战略和方式。从现场研究中,它可以得出结论,至少有三点(1)每个候选人被既定的组织和社区支持自2004年以来为选举支持。所以,四个现任容易赢得了比赛; (2)成功团队有很多共同点,例如通过使用地址列表的名称使用策略来关注支持者(基础MASA)的核心“;最后(3)他们雇用任何象征性,真正容易理解对于伊斯兰价值,组织价值,意识形态等普通人来说,通过在促进候选人,志愿组织和其他形式的非正式社区的候选人方面采用许多社会活动和仪式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号