首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Design, Manufacturing and Mechatronics >Scientific Research Paper Ranking Algorithm PTRA: A Tradeoff between Time and Citation Network
【24h】

Scientific Research Paper Ranking Algorithm PTRA: A Tradeoff between Time and Citation Network

机译:科学研究论文排名算法PTRA:时间与引用网络之间的权衡

获取原文

摘要

Most of the scientific research engines utilize the same way to rank scientific research papers (SRP), this way is highly depend on the citation network. The retrieved results of these engines for any keyword contain old papers with the highest citation value. In this paper, we proposed a new and easy to implement ranking algorithm for scientific research papers known as Paper Time Ranking Algorithm (PTRA). PTRA is a new ranking algorithm that depends on three factors to rank its results; paper age, citation index and publication venue. To construct and prove our ranking algorithm we created a web crawler that crawl different scientific search papers databases in the world to collect the information that PTRA needs. Unfortunately, some of this information was missing, such as, the impact factor of the journals. To collect this information, we created another crawler that search the Internet for these journals impact factors. However, to prove our ranking algorithm results, we have compared PTRA with Google scholar ranking algorithm. We used Google scholar, since it has more than 50 million papers and its own system can gather and collect papers in a faster way. Our comparison results show that, citation index has the highest impact on Google scholars ranking algorithm results. Unlike PTRA that gains the paper age a higher impact on the ranked results. However, PTRA depends on the citation index and publication venue to rank the results but with less impact than the paper age.
机译:大多数科学研究引擎利用相同的方式对科学研究论文(SRP)进行排名,这种方式高度依赖于引文网络。对于任何关键字的这些引擎的检索结果包含具有最高引用值的旧文件。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的且易于实施称为纸张时间排名算法(PTRA)的科学研究论文的排名算法。 PTRA是一种新的排名算法,其取决于三个因素来对结果进行排名;纸龄,引文指数和出版场地。构建和证明我们的排名算法我们创建了一个Web爬虫,爬上世界上不同的科学搜索文件数据库,以收集PTRA所需的信息。不幸的是,一些这些信息缺失,例如,期刊的影响因素。要收集此信息,我们创建了另一种履带的爬网程序,用于搜索互联网的这些期刊影响因素。但是,为了证明我们的排名算法结果,我们将PTRA与Google学者排名算法比较。我们使用谷歌学者,因为它拥有超过5000万篇论文,其自己的系统可以以更快的方式收集和收集文件。我们的比较结果表明,引文指数对谷歌学者的排名算法产生了最高影响。与PTRA不同,将纸张年龄提高,对排名结果的影响较高。然而,PTRA取决于引文指数和出版场地,以对结果进行排名,但与纸张年龄的影响较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号