首页> 外文会议>Energy economics lberian conference >Economic and Environmental assessment: EU cross-country efficiency ranking analysis
【24h】

Economic and Environmental assessment: EU cross-country efficiency ranking analysis

机译:经济与环境评估:欧盟越野效率排名分析

获取原文

摘要

This article aims to estimate and compare the efficiency of 26 different European Countries over 2001 and 2012, using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique. Both output-and input-oriented models were used in order to see if efficiency rankings change. In the input oriented model the inputs used were capital (K), labor (L), renewable energy (R) and fossil fuel (F). In the output oriented model the inputs considered were GDP/L, GDP/K, F/GDP and R/GDP (share of renewable energy in Gross Domestic Product (GDP)), and for both the output considered is GDP per greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Our results show that economic and environmental estimates for these European countries change if we propose different input or output-oriented models. It changes mainly in terms of years and technical efficiency versions. While some countries succeeded in terms of National Renewable Energy Action Plans, others observed a ranking decrease through time, thus suggesting that a higher emphasis should be provided in the accomplishment of European Environmental Policies.
机译:本文旨在使用数据包络分析(DEA)技术估算和比较2001年和2012年26个不同欧洲国家的效率。使用输出和输入导向的模型,以便查看效率排名是否发生变化。在输入面向模型中,使用的输入是大写(k),劳动力(L),可再生能量(R)和化石燃料(F)。在输出导向模型中,考虑的输入是GDP / L,GDP / K,F / GDP和R / GDP(可再生能源在国内生产总值(GDP)中的份额),并且对于每种温室气体的输出都是GDP(温室气体排放量。我们的研究结果表明,如果我们提出不同的输入或以输出导向的模型,这些欧洲国家的经济和环境估计变更了。它主要改变几年和技术效率版本。虽然一些国家在国家可再生能源行动计划方面取得成功,但其他国家通过时间观察到排名减少,因此建议应在实现欧洲环境政策方面提供更高的重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号