首页> 外文会议>World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium >Determination of Matric Suction and Saturation Degree for Unsaturated Soils, Comparative Study - Numerical Method versus Analytical Method
【24h】

Determination of Matric Suction and Saturation Degree for Unsaturated Soils, Comparative Study - Numerical Method versus Analytical Method

机译:不饱和土的测定型原料抽吸和饱和度,比较研究 - 数值方法与分析方法

获取原文

摘要

Matric suction is a soil parameter which influences the behaviour of unsaturated soils in both terms of shear strength and permeability. It is a necessary aspect to know the variation of matric suction in unsaturated soil zone for solving geotechnical issues like unsaturated soil slopes stability or bearing capacity for unsaturated foundation ground. Mathematical expression of the dependency between soil moisture content and it's matric suction (soil water characteristic curve) has a powerful character of nonlinearity. This paper presents two methods to determine the variation of matric suction along the depth included between groundwater level and soil level. First method is an analytical approach to emphasize one direction steady state unsaturated infiltration phenomenon that occurs between the groundwater level and the soil level. There were simulated three different situations in terms of border conditions: precipitations (inflow conditions on ground surface), evaporation (outflow conditions on ground surface), and perfect equilibrium (no flow on ground surface). Numerical method is finite element method used for steady state, two-dimensional, unsaturated infiltration calculus. Regarding boundary conditions there were simulated identical situations as in analytical approach. For both methods, was adopted the equation proposed by van Genuchten-Mualen (1980) for mathematical expression of soil water characteristic curve. Also for the unsaturated soil permeability prediction model was adopted the equation proposed by van Genuchten-Mualen. The fitting parameters of these models were adopted according to RETC 6.02 software in function of soil type. The analyses were performed in both methods for three major soil types: clay, silt and sand. For each soil type were concluded analyses for three situations in terms of border conditions applied on soil surface: inflow, outflow, and no flow. The obtained results are presented in order to highlight the differences/ similarities between the methods and the advantages / disadvantages of each one.
机译:原料吸入是一种土壤参数,其在剪切强度和渗透性方面影响不饱和土的行为。知道不饱和土壤中的岩土内的变化,以解决如不饱和土倾斜稳定性或承载能力,以解决不饱和土壤的岩土问题的稳定性或轴承容量。土壤水分含量与依赖性依赖性的数学表达及其在土壤水性吸附(土壤水特征曲线)具有强大的非线性特征。本文呈现了两种方法,可以确定沿着地下水位和土壤水平之间的深度测定原料吸力的变化。第一方法是强调一个方向稳态不饱和渗透现象的分析方法,该方法发生在地下水位和土壤水平之间发生的现象。在边界条件方面模拟了三种不同的情况:沉淀(地面流入条件),蒸发(地面流出条件),完美的平衡(地面没有流动)。数值方法是用于稳态,二维,不饱和渗透微积分的有限元法。关于边界条件,在分析方法中存在模拟相同情况。对于这两种方法,采用了Van Genuchten-Mualen(1980)提出的等式,用于土壤水特征曲线的数学表达。对于不饱和土壤渗透性预测模型,采用了Van Genuchten-Mizen提出的等式。根据土壤类型的RETC 6.02软件采用这些模型的拟合参数。两种方法中的三种主要土壤类型进行分析:粘土,淤泥和沙子。对于每个土壤类型,在土壤表面上施加的边界条件方面结束了三种情况:流入,流出,没有流动。提出了所得结果,以突出这些方法与每个人的优点/缺点之间的差异/相似之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号